2009
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes of Post‐Fire Runoff and Erosion: Water Repellency, Cover, or Soil Sealing?

Abstract: Few studies have attempted to isolate the various factors that may cause the observed increases in peak flows and erosion after high‐severity wildfires. This study evaluated the effects of burning by: (i) comparing soil water repellency, surface cover, and sediment yields from severely burned hillslopes, unburned hillslopes, and hillslopes where the surface cover was removed by raking; and (ii) conducting rainfall simulations to compare runoff, erosion, and surface sealing from two soils with varying ash cover… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
237
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(266 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
13
237
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of runoff coefficients found in this current study (16.7-44.5 %) agrees with the range for agricultural dominated catchments found, e.g. by Larsen et al (2007). This gives a hint towards the importance of infiltration and subsurface flow generation during events.…”
Section: Rainfall Influence On Runoff Generationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The range of runoff coefficients found in this current study (16.7-44.5 %) agrees with the range for agricultural dominated catchments found, e.g. by Larsen et al (2007). This gives a hint towards the importance of infiltration and subsurface flow generation during events.…”
Section: Rainfall Influence On Runoff Generationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Despite doubts (Gabet and Sternberg 2008) and a lack of experimental data, reduced infiltration and increased overland flow due to clogging of pores by ash has been a generally accepted effect (e.g. Larsen et al 2009). Stoof et al (2016) use laboratory experiments to explore whether this process does occur, but find that, at least for the sand used in their experiments, the presence of ash in the pores would be unlikely to promote enhanced overland flow.…”
Section: Infiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of ash on postfire runoff and erosion depend [i] on its physical and mineralogical properties: particle size, porosity, calcium carbonate content, or water repellency (Larsen et al, 2009;Woods and Balfour, 2010;Bodí et al, 2012b), [ii] on physicochemical changes in ash after the interaction with the atmosphere and water (Etiegni and Campbell, 1991), the thickness of the ash layer , and [iii] lithology and soil type of the area affected by the fire (Bodí et al, 2012b;Larsen et al, 2009;Woods and Balfour, 2010).…”
Section: Ashmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the thickness of the ash layer shows the degree of soil protection in the period immediately after the fire, and how it changes in space and time (Pereira et al, 2013c). Several studies have been conducted on the effects of ash on soil properties in burned areas which consider the thickness of the ash layer as a key to understand the impact on soil fertility on the evolution of ecosystems in the post-fire (Mallik et al, 1984;Leighton-Boyce et al, 2007;Cerdà and Doerr, 2008;Gabet and Sternberg, 2008;Onda et al, 2008;Balfour, 2008, 2010;Larsen et al, 2009;Zavala et al, 2009;Pereira et al, 2013bPereira et al, , 2013c. The spatial variability of the thickness of the ash layer may be affected by factors such as soil properties and ash texture.…”
Section: And Some Years (Ruiz Del Castillo 2000)mentioning
confidence: 99%