1932
DOI: 10.1097/00010694-193211000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes of Low Nitrification Capacity of Certain Soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1933
1933
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The period of 28 days is sufficient to nitrify all the nitrogen of the ammonium sulfate when the soil has a high nitrifying capacity. At the end of that period, nitrates, nitrites, and pH values were determined (6). In a third series of tests (Table 3), 100 grams of soil and 0.05 gram of nitrogen was used, with 1 gram of dicalcium phosphate instead of 8 grams to 200 grams of soil as in the previous series.…”
Section: Methods Of Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The period of 28 days is sufficient to nitrify all the nitrogen of the ammonium sulfate when the soil has a high nitrifying capacity. At the end of that period, nitrates, nitrites, and pH values were determined (6). In a third series of tests (Table 3), 100 grams of soil and 0.05 gram of nitrogen was used, with 1 gram of dicalcium phosphate instead of 8 grams to 200 grams of soil as in the previous series.…”
Section: Methods Of Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…properties and microorganisms and, in many cases, decreases the power to nitrification (Lebedjantzev, 1924;Mortenson and Duley, 1931;Bharaucha and Wagle, 1957;and Harpstead and Brage, 1958). However, Fraps and Sterges (1932) found that nitrifying bacteria may remain in dry soil for many years and that the changes in nitrifying power due to air drying may be slight. In view of these observations, studies similar to those reported in table 3 were made on two soils in fresh and air-dried conditions.…”
Section: ]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low rates of nitrification in acidic soils have been described for many years (De Boer and Kowalchuk, 2001) and rates often increase when acidic soils are amended with bases such as calcium carbonate (Fraps and Sterges, 1932), as also shown in Cerrado soil (Rosolem et al, 2003). Inhibition of ammonia oxidation at low pH was traditionally considered to be due to the low availability of ammonia (NH3), through ionization to NH4 + , but may be alleviated in soil by growth in aggregates or on surfaces (Allison and Prosser, 1993;De Boer et al, 1991), urease activity (Burton and Prosser, 2001;de Boer et al, 1989) or through growth of acidophilic archaeal ammonia oxidizers (Gubry-Rangin et al, 2011;Lehtovirta-Morley et al, 2011) at low pH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…On the other hand, the incubation of the Campo sujo soil in slurries with Craibstone soil of same pH (original pH of 5.3) in a ratio 1:1 accumulated nitrate due to the activity of ammonia oxidizers from the Craibstone soil. In 1932, Fraps and Sterges presented similar conclusion that soils with little ability to nitrify has increased nitrate concentration after either soil pH modification with calcium carbonate and/or with the addition of nitrifying soil (Fraps and Sterges, 1932).…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%