Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Causes of climate change over the historical record

Abstract: This review addresses the causes of observed climate variations across the industrial period, from 1750 to present. It focuses on long-term changes, both in response to external forcing and to climate variability in the ocean and atmosphere. A synthesis of results from attribution studies based on palaeoclimatic reconstructions covering the recent few centuries to the 20th century, and instrumental data shows how greenhouse gases began to cause warming since the beginning of industrialization, causing trends t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 241 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two warming periods differ mostly in the Kuroshio region, the extratropical South Pacific and the Southern Ocean; the differences are reflected by a pattern correlation of only r =0.36 between the two periods. The differences in the patterns of the two warming periods can be due to the large observational uncertainty in the early warming period (see Figures S2, S4, and S5 for a comparison between the different observational data sets), due to differences in the forcing that drives the warming or due to multidecadal to centennial variability (e.g., Latif et al, 2013; Stevens, 2015; Hegerl et al, 2019).…”
Section: Global and Local Consistency Of Sst Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two warming periods differ mostly in the Kuroshio region, the extratropical South Pacific and the Southern Ocean; the differences are reflected by a pattern correlation of only r =0.36 between the two periods. The differences in the patterns of the two warming periods can be due to the large observational uncertainty in the early warming period (see Figures S2, S4, and S5 for a comparison between the different observational data sets), due to differences in the forcing that drives the warming or due to multidecadal to centennial variability (e.g., Latif et al, 2013; Stevens, 2015; Hegerl et al, 2019).…”
Section: Global and Local Consistency Of Sst Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying decadal SST anomalies in the 1930s resembled the warm phases of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) 16,17 and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) 18,19 (Fig. 1b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…ERAf has demonstrated interannual and multidecadal surface heat fluxes comparable with the reanalyses (cf. figure 7 in Hegerl et al, 2019).…”
Section: Century-long Reanalyses and Forced Ocean Model Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%