1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-8715-0_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cause and Effect in the Pilot-Wave Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reading goes against a "generosity" principle advocated by Brown et al (1996), Pylkkänen et al (2014), who plausibly attribute particles some degree of intrinsicality. If the wave function really "embodied" all apparently intrinsic properties of particles, and referred to a global power of the configuration of particles, how could such a global power be considered concrete and not just an abstract property of the configuration?…”
Section: The Second Point Raises Some Questions To Readings Of Bohmiamentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This reading goes against a "generosity" principle advocated by Brown et al (1996), Pylkkänen et al (2014), who plausibly attribute particles some degree of intrinsicality. If the wave function really "embodied" all apparently intrinsic properties of particles, and referred to a global power of the configuration of particles, how could such a global power be considered concrete and not just an abstract property of the configuration?…”
Section: The Second Point Raises Some Questions To Readings Of Bohmiamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Without assigning localized matter points or particles some kind of intrinsic dispositions (as in Brown et al 1996), to contribute (together with the other particles' disposition) to the emergence of an irreducible holistically power to fix the velocity of any particle in the global configuration, the version of holistic primitive ontology that Esfeld et al (2015) paper defend might become unintelligible. It is for this reason that an ontology of events endowed with intrinsic dispositions but related by irreducible and holistic relations of entanglement seem preferable to an ontology constituted by primitive matter points devoid of any intrinsic powers but kept together so to speak by a holistic disposition.…”
Section: The Second Point Raises Some Questions To Readings Of Bohmiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7. It is fair to point out that it has come under some criticism in recent years from metaphysicians, 40 but it is also fair to describe it as virtually a consensus among philosophers, and philosophically inclined workers, in cognitive science and the philosophy of the special sciences. 41 For these reasons we find the attacks on the coherence of the Everettian ontology unpersuasive, committed as they are either to conflict with mainstream views in physics and in general philosophy.…”
Section: Decoherencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(9) 40 In particular, Jaegwon Kim; see for instance. (37) 41 For a recent review of the debate, see Ross and Spurrett, (38) and the comments on their paper in a forthcoming issue of Behavioral and Brain Sciences.…”
Section: Degrees Of Reality?mentioning
confidence: 99%