1992
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90032-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cauliflower mosaic virus: A 420 subunit (T = 7), multilayer structure

Abstract: The structures of the Cabb-B and CM 1841 strains of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) have been solved to about 3 nm resolution from unstained, frozen-hydrated samples that were examined with low-irradiation cryo-electron microscopy and three-dimensional image reconstruction procedures. CaMV is highly susceptible to distortions. Spherical particles, with a maximum diameter of 53.8 nm, are composed of three concentric layers (I-III) of solvent-excluded density that surround a large, solvent-filled cavity (∼27 nm … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
58
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Common Lines often fails or leads to inconsistent results with cryoEM images recorded close to focus (<1.5 m) or with viruses that do not have coarse morphological features (see Example 4, below). Our Common Lines analysis of CaMV only succeeded after we recorded focal pairs of vitrified specimens and used a 2.4-m underfocus micrograph to determine initial orientations of the particles and applied these values to the same particles in the closer-to-focus (1.2-m), lower-dose image (Cheng et al, 1992). As a test, we reexamined the same 1.2-m image with Common Lines and were only able to identify the correct orientation view for 1 of the 21 CaMV particle images that went into the original 3D reconstruction.…”
Section: Pft Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Common Lines often fails or leads to inconsistent results with cryoEM images recorded close to focus (<1.5 m) or with viruses that do not have coarse morphological features (see Example 4, below). Our Common Lines analysis of CaMV only succeeded after we recorded focal pairs of vitrified specimens and used a 2.4-m underfocus micrograph to determine initial orientations of the particles and applied these values to the same particles in the closer-to-focus (1.2-m), lower-dose image (Cheng et al, 1992). As a test, we reexamined the same 1.2-m image with Common Lines and were only able to identify the correct orientation view for 1 of the 21 CaMV particle images that went into the original 3D reconstruction.…”
Section: Pft Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first glance these two viruses appear quite similar with prominent ''caps'' of density at the 12 icosahedral vertices. Closer inspection reveals many striking differences in the capsid sub- , and 7 of the refinement: the refined models and the original, 21-particle reconstruction of CaMV obtained by Common Lines (Cheng et al, 1992) (Griffith et al, 1992). structure.…”
Section: Example 3: Cpmv Model-analysis Of X174 and Vice Versamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wikoff, et al, 1994), or a simple, geometric structure constructed in silico (e.g. Cheng, et al, 1992). The potential for model-induced bias in the reconstruction process always exists with indirect models since they are not derived from the images being analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is constituted of three concentric shells, built from 420 capsid protein subunits, surrounding a large inner cavity with a diameter of approximately 250 Å (4,37). The physical association between P3 and viral particles has been consistently demonstrated in mature CaMV virions by copurification, immunolabeling experiments, and in vitro interactions (7,(23)(24)(25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%