2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caught in a trap: How pre-clinical studies in laboratory mice exaggerate vaccine responses

Abstract: Summary In a recent issue of Cell Host and Microbe , Fiege and colleagues 1 report that laboratory mice exposed to pathogens from pet-store mice exhibit impaired humoral immunity to influenza vaccination and display gene expression signatures that more authentically reflect human vaccine responses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be a consequence of the fact that the sequential infection included chronic pathogens. A second possibility, consistent with studies in young “dirty” mice, is that there is little effect of antigenic history on the primary immune response to influenza virus, as shown in one ( 15 , 49 ) but not all ( 47 ) studies. Because an effect of prior Ag exposure was seen on vaccination, resulting in compromised responses to heterosubtypic challenge of young mice ( 15 ), additional studies in “dirty” aged mice are needed to assess the innate, humoral, and cellular responses to primary infection and vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might be a consequence of the fact that the sequential infection included chronic pathogens. A second possibility, consistent with studies in young “dirty” mice, is that there is little effect of antigenic history on the primary immune response to influenza virus, as shown in one ( 15 , 49 ) but not all ( 47 ) studies. Because an effect of prior Ag exposure was seen on vaccination, resulting in compromised responses to heterosubtypic challenge of young mice ( 15 ), additional studies in “dirty” aged mice are needed to assess the innate, humoral, and cellular responses to primary infection and vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…These data contribute an aging perspective to the literature comparing the immune response of “clean,” SPF-maintained laboratory mice and “dirty” mice, generated by a variety of methods, including sequential infection, cohousing with pet store or wild mice, or transfer of microbiota from wild mice ( 14–17 , 20–24 , 47 ). The published literature on immunity in dirty mice has shown variable results, with some studies showing enhanced immunity ( 17 , 47 , 48 ) and others showing depressed immunity ( 15 , 49 ) or no effect ( 48 ). Variations in these results likely reflect differences in the manner of inducing antigenic experience, the pathogen used to assess immunity, the type of immune responses analyzed, and the time points and/or age at which the assessments were undertaken.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific pathogen free (SPF) male C57BL/6J mice were born and bred at the Laboratory Animal Centre of Sun Yat-sen University. SPF mice are free from a defined list of pathogens by routine testing and housed in clean conditions that minimize exposure to pathogens (Coughlan, 2021). Therefore, nonspecific microorganisms and parasites are allowed in SPF mice.…”
Section: Animal Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following our reductionist tendencies, the character and make up of mouse microbiota is being intensively defined and simplified as specific-pathogen-free facilities are increasingly used (493,494). Normalizing the microbiome to one that more closely resembles wild mice leads to several substantial changes in immune response (495)(496)(497)(498). Thus, colonization with comparatively non-immunogenic microbiota may be yet another factor that needs to be accounted for when modeling human autoimmune disease in mice.…”
Section: Microbiota/pet Store Micementioning
confidence: 99%