1975
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)67178-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caudal Regression Syndrome: The Urologic Implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 In many cases, the renal malformation is not an isolated anomaly, but occurs as part of a multiorgan congenital syndrome. For instance, renal agenesis and other renal malformations can occur in the context of the caudal regression syndrome, [11][12][13] which is defined by a characteristic pattern of malformations including agenesis of the lower vertebral column, imperforate anus, and caudal spinal cord malformations that often appear as a terminal myelomeningocele. 12,14 -16 However, the reason for, and the mechanism of, this particular association are unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 In many cases, the renal malformation is not an isolated anomaly, but occurs as part of a multiorgan congenital syndrome. For instance, renal agenesis and other renal malformations can occur in the context of the caudal regression syndrome, [11][12][13] which is defined by a characteristic pattern of malformations including agenesis of the lower vertebral column, imperforate anus, and caudal spinal cord malformations that often appear as a terminal myelomeningocele. 12,14 -16 However, the reason for, and the mechanism of, this particular association are unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eighty-two were selected for one feature or another (Frantz & Aitken ' For example, the cases make it clear that if maternal diabetes and sacral abnormalities are associated, the association is predominantly with symmetrical absence of sacral vertebral elements (with or without absence of more rostra1 vertebrae). , Perry et al 1970, Rubenstein & Bucy 1975, Phillips et al 1982, Borrelli et al 1985 and are not further considered. (Citations and tabulated details concerning the remainder are obtainable from the author.)…”
Section: Retrospective Surveys Of Sacral Dysplasiamentioning
confidence: 99%