The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound distance and volume measurements using a commercially available three-dimensional ultrasound scanner. Sixty-two distance measurements were performed twice on an ultrasound tissue-mimicking phantom located in a water bath. Three-dimensional ultrasound distance measurements were compared to the actual distance. Volume measurements were made in a water bath with 21 balloons of various shapes ranging in volume from 20 ml to 490 ml. Three-dimensional ultrasound volume measurements were compared to actual balloon volumes and to conventional two-dimensional ultrasound volume calculations. The mean absolute error in three-dimensional ultrasound distance measurements was 1.0 +/- 0.8% (range, -2.3 to +1.9%) in the plane of acquisition and 1.0 +/- 0.6% (range, -2.0 to -0.2%) for planes with other orientations. Three-dimensional ultrasound volume measurements showed a mean absolute error of 6.4 +/- 4.4% (range, -6.0% to +15.5%), which was considerably better than two-dimensional ultrasound volume estimates having a mean absolute error of 12.6 +/- 8.7% (range, -27.5% to +39.2%). Volume measurements using two-dimensional ultrasound methods were much less accurate than three-dimensional ultrasound methods for irregularly shaped objects. In conclusion, our data show that three-dimensional ultrasound measurements of distance and volume are sufficiently accurate to use clinically.

No abstract

No abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of distance and volume measurements obtained by three‐dimensional ultrasonography. A tissue‐mimicking phantom was scanned using a prototype three‐dimensional sonographic imaging system to verify distance measurements. Measurements were taken from the reconstructed three‐dimensional sonographic data and compared to the real distances. Volume measurements were obtained by scanning 30 balloons of various shapes, sized 23 ml to 2400 ml. Each balloon was scanned twice in two orientations; three different masks were accomplished for each volume. Each volume measurement of 180 three‐dimensional sonographic measurements was compared to conventional two‐dimensional ultrasonographic volume estimates and to the actual, measured balloon size. Distance measurements had a mean error of 0.02 +/‐ 3.65% (range, ‐4.27 to 7.18%). Two‐dimensional sonographic volume estimates using traditional scanner based methods had a mean error of 13.7 +/‐ 10.1%. Three‐dimensional sonographic volume measurements had a mean error of 2.2 +/‐ 2.9% for regular and irregular objects over the entire range of volumes. The masking required 10 to 30 min. The field of view varied from 10 to 24 cm with a mean object depth of 9.8 cm. Three‐dimensional ultrasonographic methods can provide accurate volume measurements of regular and irregular objects and offer improved accuracy compared to traditional two‐dimensional methods.

No abstract

The fetal hard and soft palates of the mouth can be accessed using a new technique, which we call the "flipped face" maneuver, when an adequate volume of the face can be obtained.

Three-dimensional US is useful to identify the location and extent of facial clefting. The advantages of 3D US are the following: (a) The face may be viewed in a standard orientation, (b) the defect may be viewed systematically by using an interactive display, and (c) the rendered image provides landmarks for the planar images. Patient decisions may be affected, since they can view the abnormality on a recognizable 3D rendered image.

Color Doppler and gray scale sonography can be used prenatally to identify the location of the cord insertion into the placenta. The purposes of this paper were to (1) relate sonographic identification of placental cord insertion with placental pathology; (2) evaluate the possibility that a marginal cord insertion may evolve into a velamentous cord insertion; and (3) determine the frequency and factors affecting sonographic visualization of cord insertion. Our results show that the sonographic assessment of cord insertion correlated with the pathologic outcome in 83% (106 of 128) of singleton pregnancies and at least one of the fetuses in 72% (8 of 11) of twin or triplet pregnancies. Although the sensitivity for identification of an abnormal cord insertion was low (42%), the specificity was high (95%). Our data suggest that marginal cord insertion evolved into velamentous cord insertion in one singleton and one twin. Our results showed that cord insertion was visualized in 54% of fetuses scanned in a routine clinical practice. Cord insertion visualization was possible at all gestational ages, although it was more difficult at later gestational ages. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that (1) ultrasonography (either gray scale or color Doppler) is useful in identifying normal, marginal, and velamentous cord insertion; (2) marginal cord insertion may evolve into velamentous cord insertion as pregnancy progresses; (3) in clinical practice the cord insertion site was visualized in just over half of the cases, and (4) prenatal identification of marginal and velamentous cord insertion potentially may be useful for planning obstetrical management.