2014
DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2014.905398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caucuses in Collaborative Governance: Modeling the Effects of Structure, Power, and Problem Complexity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the ability of officials to assess the impact of their own work on PH, their beliefs about their capability to persuade stakeholders to invest in health policies, or the charisma of actors to direct the consensus-building process towards a direction that suits their interests [24,[26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the ability of officials to assess the impact of their own work on PH, their beliefs about their capability to persuade stakeholders to invest in health policies, or the charisma of actors to direct the consensus-building process towards a direction that suits their interests [24,[26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also broader social forces like capitalism or globalization may indirectly shape the policy process. Further, timing, policy free space and fiscal resources are important physical opportunity factors, because decisionmaking moments are often structured, national devolved obligations need to be met and budgets limit how flexible officials can be in choosing their actions [24,[26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The involvement of multiple parties in a collective decision-making process is known as policy network, as conveyed by Howlett and Ramesh (1995), and Compston (2009). The other term on collective decision making is also called collaborative governance, as conveyed by Ansell and Gash (2007); Wanna and O'Flynn (2008); O'Leary, Slyke and Kim (2010); Choi and Robertson (2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%