2004
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cattell-Horn-Carroll broad cognitive ability profiles of low math achievers

Abstract: This study extends previous research examining the relations between Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive abilities and math achievement. The cognitive profiles of children with normative weaknesses in Math Calculation Skills or Math Reasoning were compared to those of their average-achieving peers. The cognitive profile of the low Math Calculation Skills group (n ϭ 68) was similar to that of their average-achieving peers. The low Math Reasoning group (n ϭ 52) scored lower than their average-achieving peers on the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(31 reference statements)
3
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that Processing Speed, Comprehension-Knowledge, and Fluid Reasoning scores demonstrate moderate-to-strong effects on Quantitative Knowledge scores from childhood to adult age, although Floyd and colleagues also reported a moderate effect for Short-Term Memory scores. Proctor, Floyd, and Shaver (2005) used profile analysis to compare the cognitive ability scores of children with low math reasoning or calculation scores to the cognitive ability scores of their peers without such low scores. They observed no major differences on the cognitive ability scores between those with low and average math reasoning scores, they did find that children with problem-solving deficits demonstrated lower scores on measures of Fluid Reasoning and Comprehension-Knowledge, as well lower scores on an aggregated measure of cognitive ability.…”
Section: Effects Of Cattell-horn-carroll Cognitive Constructs On Quanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that Processing Speed, Comprehension-Knowledge, and Fluid Reasoning scores demonstrate moderate-to-strong effects on Quantitative Knowledge scores from childhood to adult age, although Floyd and colleagues also reported a moderate effect for Short-Term Memory scores. Proctor, Floyd, and Shaver (2005) used profile analysis to compare the cognitive ability scores of children with low math reasoning or calculation scores to the cognitive ability scores of their peers without such low scores. They observed no major differences on the cognitive ability scores between those with low and average math reasoning scores, they did find that children with problem-solving deficits demonstrated lower scores on measures of Fluid Reasoning and Comprehension-Knowledge, as well lower scores on an aggregated measure of cognitive ability.…”
Section: Effects Of Cattell-horn-carroll Cognitive Constructs On Quanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial processing deficits have been also associated with math disorder (Osmon, Smerz, Braun, & Plambeck, 2006). Low scores on fluid reasoning measures correlate with lower scores on math reasoning tests but were not related to computational skills in children with math disorder (Proctor, Floyd, & Shaver, 2005). In contrast to the math disorder findings, fluid reasoning has been found to be a cognitive strength in some children diagnosed with ASD (Hayashi, Kato, Igarashi, & Kashima, 2008;Soulières et al, 2009).…”
Section: Visual-spatial and Fluid Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Alguns estudos dos dois últimos anos também indicam o uso do Modelo CHC na avaliação psicoeducacional (McKenna-Mattson, 2005) e mais especificamente na compreensão das dificuldades de aprendizagem (Fiorello & Primerano, 2005), incluindo a matemática (Proctor, Floyd, & Shaver, 2005) e a compreensão da leitura (Floyd, Bergeron, & Alfonso, 2006). Tais estudos parecem buscar a relação entre as capacidades cognitivas propostas no modelo e as dificuldades de aprendizagem, visando informar prováveis perfis cognitivos associados às dificuldades.…”
Section: Considerações Finaisunclassified