2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Categorizing ocean conservation targets to avoid a potential false sense of protection to society: Portugal as a case-study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As long as there are no major changes in the current seabed exploitation (including the use of highly impacting fishing gears and seabed mining) and aquaculture regimes, the Azorean MPAs will maintain their Moderately to Fully Protected status under the regulation-based classification. This situation is similar to MPAs in other Portuguese regions (Horta e Costa et al 2019), where fully protection is residual and the less protected class is moderately protected. This is a relevant level of protection when compared with most other regions in Europe, which would most possibly be considered Unprotected or Poorly Protected under this classification given their authorisation of higher impact of gears.…”
Section: The Azores Mpassupporting
confidence: 79%
“…As long as there are no major changes in the current seabed exploitation (including the use of highly impacting fishing gears and seabed mining) and aquaculture regimes, the Azorean MPAs will maintain their Moderately to Fully Protected status under the regulation-based classification. This situation is similar to MPAs in other Portuguese regions (Horta e Costa et al 2019), where fully protection is residual and the less protected class is moderately protected. This is a relevant level of protection when compared with most other regions in Europe, which would most possibly be considered Unprotected or Poorly Protected under this classification given their authorisation of higher impact of gears.…”
Section: The Azores Mpassupporting
confidence: 79%
“…What is needed to achieve effective ocean protection? To prevent overestimation of how much ocean is actually protected (9,19,25,26), knowledge of the total MPA coverage across different levels of protection is needed at the global scale. This requires assessment of the number, area, and impact of MPAs to ensure these are sufficient to achieve local, national, or international goals for healthy, productive, and resilient ocean ecosystems that support biodiversity and sustainable use (27).…”
Section: Removing Confusion Around Marine Protected Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the rearrangement of the no-take/access area came at the expense of a greater edge effect, which led to the decision to increase the no-take areas (i.e., fully protected zones) to offset that disadvantage. Indeed, if this zoning is accepted and declared by the government, the resulting no-take area, totalling 20.4km 2 , will be the largest in mainland Portugal (Horta e Costa et al, 2019). The suggested change in this area's position and shape also led to recognizing that relevant nearshore habitats with conservation interest could be left with less protection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%