2006
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.066548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catch-Bond Model Derived from Allostery Explains Force-Activated Bacterial Adhesion

Abstract: High shear enhances the adhesion of Escherichia coli bacteria binding to mannose coated surfaces via the adhesin FimH, raising the question as to whether FimH forms catch bonds that are stronger under tensile mechanical force. Here, we study the length of time that E. coli pause on mannosylated surfaces and report a double exponential decay in the duration of the pauses. This double exponential decay is unlike previous single molecule or whole cell data for other catch bonds, and indicates the existence of two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
270
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(291 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
20
270
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In principle, it would be easy to include more complicated rupture scenarios, like the catch-slip behavior recently reported for both P-and L-selectin [7,15]. There is good reason to believe that this molecular behavior is essential for the physiological function of these molecules and different theoretical models have been suggested to explain this behavior [63,64,65]. If combined with our modeling framework for adhesive dynamics, these models might be tested against experimental data from flow chamber experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, it would be easy to include more complicated rupture scenarios, like the catch-slip behavior recently reported for both P-and L-selectin [7,15]. There is good reason to believe that this molecular behavior is essential for the physiological function of these molecules and different theoretical models have been suggested to explain this behavior [63,64,65]. If combined with our modeling framework for adhesive dynamics, these models might be tested against experimental data from flow chamber experiments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include energy landscapes with one bound state and two unbinding pathways 43 ; an energy landscape with two bound states, one of which is preferentially stabilized by force 44,45 ; bond dissociation along a multidimensional landscape where the direction of the tensile force and the reaction coordinate are misaligned [46][47][48] ; a freeenergy landscape with dynamic disorder that thermally fluctuates with time 49,50 ; and allosteric deformation models where external force changes the structure of the receptor either directly at the ligand-binding site 51 or at a distal location that ultimately propagates the deformation to the binding pocket [52][53][54][55] . Our simulations suggest that X-dimers form catch bonds via a slidingrebinding mechanism where a pulling force flexes the ectodomain and slides opposing EC1 domains resulting in the formation of de novo, force-induced H-bonds.…”
Section: Article Nature Communications | Doi: 101038/ncomms4941mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a variety of mechanisms and associated kinetic models have been postulated to explain the molecular basis for catchslip transitions (16,(19)(20)(21)(22), there remains little consensus regarding which description is most appropriate for selectins. This uncertainty is largely a consequence of the considerable number of theoretical parameters-4 or more-used to model lowdimensional force-lifetime data.…”
Section: Selectin-ligand Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%