2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2907.2001.00081.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catastrophic events and recovery from low densities in populations of otariids: implications for risk of extinction

Abstract: Two key factors in a population's risk of extinction are major population declines induced by natural or anthropogenic events (catastrophes) and whether the population's rate of growth increases or decreases at very low abundance levels. These two elements should be included in any population viability analysis (PVA), but estimates of the frequency and intensity of catastrophic events and data on the dynamics of low population densities are difficult to obtain. We examined the literature on population dynamics… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
86
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
86
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar population recoveries following catastrophic events have been reported among otrariids (Gerber & Hilborn 2001). The recovery during the first years appeared to be slower than potentially allowed by the high survival rate of the individuals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar population recoveries following catastrophic events have been reported among otrariids (Gerber & Hilborn 2001). The recovery during the first years appeared to be slower than potentially allowed by the high survival rate of the individuals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Small populations are at greater risk of extinction than large ones as a result of environmental variation or demographic stochasticity and processes, such as the Allee effect (Lande 1993, Mangel & Tier 1994, Courchamp et al 1999, Coulson et al 2001, Gerber & Hilborn 2001, Berec et al 2007, Good et al 2008, Melbourne & Hastings 2008. These general conclusions raise concerns for the conservation of small populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…only on-shelf foraging, will increase local intraspecifc competition and reduce the population's buffering against changes in the local environment, which may explain the slower recovery and smaller size of this population. Fluctuations in the recovery rate of other seal populations have been linked to environmental factors and in particular El Niño events (Gerber & Hilborn 2001). For example, Galapagos sea lions were severely affected by the 1982-83 El Niño event that caused increased mortality, local redistribution, and a slow recovery (Trill mich & Dellinger 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous comparative analyses fitting heavy-tailed distributions (distributions with higher probabilities of extreme events than the normal distribution) to time series have not accounted for an underlying population dynamics model (14-17). Alternatively, most examples of population dieoffs come from identifying sudden changes in abundance that exceed a chosen threshold of decline (9,(18)(19)(20). However, this approach does not distinguish events from expected dynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%