2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.03.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalytic combustion of ethyl acetate and nano-structural changes of ruthenium catalysts supported on tin oxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[37] By contrast, as ubstantial difference was visible for both catalysts prepared by chemical reduction,f or which the Ru signal was considerably higher andi nt he same range than for the Ru/TiO 2 (R20) catalyst. Both samples after calcination displayed lower Ru signals, probably caused by the presence of large RuO 2 agglomerates.…”
Section: Time-of-flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Analysismentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[37] By contrast, as ubstantial difference was visible for both catalysts prepared by chemical reduction,f or which the Ru signal was considerably higher andi nt he same range than for the Ru/TiO 2 (R20) catalyst. Both samples after calcination displayed lower Ru signals, probably caused by the presence of large RuO 2 agglomerates.…”
Section: Time-of-flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Analysismentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As mall Ru intensity in- crease was observed after thermalr eduction, probablyc aused by the absence of interaction between such large agglomerates and the support, so that during the high temperature hydrogen treatment, partial redispersion occurred. [37] By contrast, as ubstantial difference was visible for both catalysts prepared by chemical reduction,f or which the Ru signal was considerably higher andi nt he same range than for the Ru/TiO 2 (R20) catalyst. This is in agreement with the TEM observations,i nw hich more Ru particles were observed on the surface of Ru/TiO 2 (A-3).…”
Section: Time-of-flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Analysismentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Recently, we have shown that activity of ruthenium in the butane and propane oxidation decreased during a few successive catalytic runs or after treatment in oxygen at temperature above 250 • C [7,9]. The literature data also confirmed activity loss of the Ru catalysts during VOCs combustion [8]. It has been proposed that the deactivation is due to nanoparticle sintering or to the formation of bulk RuO 2 oxide that possesses lower activity than that of dispersed RuO x species [7,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Propane, toluene and orthoxylene oxidation over Ru/CeO 2 [5] and Ru/␥-Al 2 O 3 was studied [6], butane and ethyl acetate oxidation over Ru supported on ␥-Al 2 O 3 and SnO 2 was investigated [7,8]. Recently, we have shown that activity of ruthenium in the butane and propane oxidation decreased during a few successive catalytic runs or after treatment in oxygen at temperature above 250 • C [7,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, tin oxide based materials have received much less attention in catalysis. There are only few reports where the catalytic activity of these materials in oxidative dehydrogenation of hydrocarbons [2][3][4], selective catalytic reduction of NO x by hydrocarbons [5][6][7] or CO [6], low temperature oxidation of CO [8,9] or methane [10,11], volatile organic compounds combustion [12][13][14], and methanol steam reforming [1,15] was tested. It was discussed that the crucial point in catalytic behavior of SnO 2 concerned its easy reducibility leading to the simultaneous existence of Sn 2+ and Sn 4+ surface sites and a propensity to generate oxygen defects during thermal treatment [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%