2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalyst separation in atom transfer radical polymerization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
191
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
1
191
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, these authors pointed out that the branching level can be increased by increasing the targeted chain length (TCL), i.e., the initial molar ratio of monomer to ATRP initiator. Even though selection of the appropriate ATRP catalyst enables the synthesis of well-defined polyacrylates and purification methods are available for its removal, [37][38][39][40][41] the amount of catalyst in a normal ATRP process is too high to obtain an economic profitable process. [1,42] Therefore, in the last years, ATRP modified techniques [5,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] have been developed in which a low catalyst concentration (ppm level with respect to monomer) is employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these authors pointed out that the branching level can be increased by increasing the targeted chain length (TCL), i.e., the initial molar ratio of monomer to ATRP initiator. Even though selection of the appropriate ATRP catalyst enables the synthesis of well-defined polyacrylates and purification methods are available for its removal, [37][38][39][40][41] the amount of catalyst in a normal ATRP process is too high to obtain an economic profitable process. [1,42] Therefore, in the last years, ATRP modified techniques [5,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] have been developed in which a low catalyst concentration (ppm level with respect to monomer) is employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catalysts need to be removed from the polymers through various adsorption and extraction techniques [34]. They need to be removed since catalyst-ligand residue is not wanted in the final product, as it induces aging, colors and may add toxic aspects [39], especially when heavy metals, typically Cu(I), would remain in the product. These removals have been demonstrated on a laboratory scale, yet would be technically difficult on an industrial level resulting in expensive products.…”
Section: Crp Adding To or Competing With Traditional Free Radical Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes the method more suitable for niche markets, where there are high sales prices [34]. It is also to be considered that ATRP is not compatible with monomers containing certain functional groups, such as carboxylic acids, amines, ketones and certain ionic groups [39], that could deactivate the catalyst. This problem can sometimes be avoided using protection chemistry, but constitutes of course another severe limitation of the method.…”
Section: Crp Adding To or Competing With Traditional Free Radical Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flask was then placed in an oil bath with a preset temperature of 90 8C and rotation with slow velocity was maintained for 24 h. The reaction mixture was let to cool at room temperature, filtered and washed with hot toluene, hot chloroform, and methanol repeatedly. For the separation of the remaining catalyst, 30 particles were placed to a round-bottomed flask, suspended in the mixture of methanol and aqueous solution of K 2 EDTA (0.25 M), and then the flask was rotated at 40 8C for 6 h. After filtration, silica particles were washed with water, methanol, and diethyl ether and dried under vacuum, and then were ready for packing in stainless steel column (250 mm  4.6 mm i.d. ).…”
Section: General Procedures For Atrp From Initiator-grafted Silica Parmentioning
confidence: 99%