1909
DOI: 10.5479/si.03629236.62.i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalogue of the type-specimens of mammals in the United States National Museum, including the Biological Survey collection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, the number of type specimens in the mammal collection continues to grow, issuing both from new expeditions that document previously undescribed mammal taxa and from new research in the field of mammalian systematics. Following the precedent set by the two preceding catalogs of USNM mammal types (Lyon and Osgood, 1909;Poole and Schantz, 1942), this current series exemplifies that collaborative nature of biological research among authors from the U.S. Geological Survey (Fisher) and the Smithsonian Institution (Ludwig), who have long cooperated to help ensure the proper stewardship of the National Collections of Mammals.…”
Section: Smithsonian Contributions To Anthropology Smithsonian Contrimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Of course, the number of type specimens in the mammal collection continues to grow, issuing both from new expeditions that document previously undescribed mammal taxa and from new research in the field of mammalian systematics. Following the precedent set by the two preceding catalogs of USNM mammal types (Lyon and Osgood, 1909;Poole and Schantz, 1942), this current series exemplifies that collaborative nature of biological research among authors from the U.S. Geological Survey (Fisher) and the Smithsonian Institution (Ludwig), who have long cooperated to help ensure the proper stewardship of the National Collections of Mammals.…”
Section: Smithsonian Contributions To Anthropology Smithsonian Contrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Lyon and Osgood (1909:26) Type Locality: Guatemala. Remarks: Hershkovitz (1954:490) restricted the type locality to the Pacific Slope of Guatemala and incorrectly cited Poole and Schantz (1942:233) for the lectotype designation when, in fact, Poole and Schantz (1942) had simply restated Lyon and Osgood (1909). …”
Section: Elasmognathus Dowii Gillmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations