2015
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3983.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Catalogue of distribution of lizards (Reptilia: Squamata) from the Brazilian Amazonia. I. Dactyloidae, Hoplocercidae, Iguanidae, Leiosauridae, Polychrotidae, Tropiduridae

Abstract: I present distribution data of all Dactyloidae, Hoplocercidae, Iguanidae, Leiosauridae, Polychrotidae and Tropiduridae lizards known from the Brazilian Amazonia, totaling 40 species-level taxa, belonging to 11 genera. This represents four more species-level taxa than previously reported for these families. Data were based on the direct examination of 41,243 specimens deposited in three North American and eight Brazilian musea, including the main collections harboring Amazonian material. Most species (62.5%) ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Biotic factors might also influence the genetic divergence associated with rivers, and in particular, the effectiveness of the barrier itself (Nosil, Harmon, & Seehausen, ). However, in the case of our focal taxa, both are found in different Amazonian forest types, including " várzea " (floodplain forest) and “ terra firme ” (upland forest; Ribeiro‐Júnior, ; Rodriguez & Duellman, , personal observations). This suggests no obvious differences in the restrictions imposed by the landscape on their respective dispersal abilities, unlike other taxa where dispersal across rivers is influenced by the surrounding habitat (Collevatti et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Biotic factors might also influence the genetic divergence associated with rivers, and in particular, the effectiveness of the barrier itself (Nosil, Harmon, & Seehausen, ). However, in the case of our focal taxa, both are found in different Amazonian forest types, including " várzea " (floodplain forest) and “ terra firme ” (upland forest; Ribeiro‐Júnior, ; Rodriguez & Duellman, , personal observations). This suggests no obvious differences in the restrictions imposed by the landscape on their respective dispersal abilities, unlike other taxa where dispersal across rivers is influenced by the surrounding habitat (Collevatti et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Biotic factors might also influence the genetic divergence associated with rivers, and in particular, the effectiveness of the barrier itself (Nosil, Harmon, & Seehausen, 2009). However, in the case of our focal taxa, both are found in different Amazonian forest types, including "várzea" (floodplain forest) and "terra firme" (upland forest;Ribeiro-Júnior, 2015;Rodriguez & Duellman, 1994, personal observations).…”
Section: Similar But Differentmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This idea is consistent with available information on the ecology and distribution of these species, as P. marmoratus has been recorded in transition zones between Amazonian forests and Cerrado savannas, while A. ortonii and A. punctatus seem to be strictly associated with closed‐canopy wet forests (Vitt et al . ; Kawashita‐Ribeiro & Ávila ; Ribeiro‐Júnior ). In the case of P. marmoratus , some capacity to tolerate transition areas between South American rainforests and their adjacent settings may have enabled higher levels of gene flow under environmental conditions that were rather restrictive for the two Anolis species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These species are similar in their arboreal habits and association with forests, but differ in their tolerance to transitional habitats: P. marmoratus explores forest edges, while the two Anolis are associated with closed‐canopy forests (Vitt et al . ; Kawashita‐Ribeiro & Ávila ; Ribeiro‐Júnior ). The ancestral ranges of these three species have been traced back to Amazonia, but the Amazonian regions that served as sources of expansion remain unclear (Prates et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We sampled 46 individuals of Anolis punctatus and 23 of Anolis ortonii (specimen and locality information in Supporting Information Table ; Supporting Information deposited in the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1bj51s9), encompassing a substantial portion of their distributions (Ribeiro‐Júnior, ). Reduced representation sequence data were generated as described by Prates, Xue, et al ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%