2018 26th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) 2018
DOI: 10.23919/eusipco.2018.8553451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cassis: Characterization with Adaptive Sample- Size Inferential Statistics Applied to Inexact Circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to assess the quality of each estimate, three additional samples of five million inputs have been used to measure the deviation of the statistical estimate. Other methods have recently been proposed to improve the estimation accuracy by dynamically adjusting the number of simulation vectors [26] or by using a formal approach to analyze errors [27].…”
Section: Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to assess the quality of each estimate, three additional samples of five million inputs have been used to measure the deviation of the statistical estimate. Other methods have recently been proposed to improve the estimation accuracy by dynamically adjusting the number of simulation vectors [26] or by using a formal approach to analyze errors [27].…”
Section: Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a handful of designs exhibits a high variation, over 5 %, mainly among high-accuracy ACA and ACAA adders. This is due to their large overlapping sub-adders inducing extremely low error rates [26]. The most critical case shows 28 % RSD for RE mean or 4 % RSD for RE max .…”
Section: Comparative Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we propose a characterization method for inexact operators according to three different metrics: the mean error distance, the error rate and the upper bound of the error distance, called maximum error distance in the rest of the paper. This framework extends the preliminary work proposed in [20]. To estimate the mean error distance and the error rate, the proposed method derives the minimal number of samples to simulate, to get an accuracy on the estimation according to a given user-defined confidence interval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We are not the first to investigate the necessary number of samples to bound the estimate of the error rate. In [27], an lower bound on the number of samples N f , similar to p n , is derived. Both numbers, N f and p n , depend on the actual value of er(f, f ) which is not known in advance.…”
Section: ) Performance Of the Proposed Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both numbers, N f and p n , depend on the actual value of er(f, f ) which is not known in advance. While in [27] this issue is addressed by iteratively approximating the error rate and the number of necessary samples alternatingly, the solution presented here is to use the improved sampling yielding a lower bound on the samples i that is independent of the actual error rate.…”
Section: ) Performance Of the Proposed Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%