1967
DOI: 10.1080/00128325.1967.11662180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cashew Nut Production in Southern Tanzania III—Early Yields From A Cashew Spacing Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Major producers of cashew nuts are India, Tanzania, Mozambique and Kenya. However, its production is constrained by low and variable nut yields, nut quality and susceptibility to pests and fungal diseases, particularly Helopeltis and powdery mildew, even though efforts have been made to improve this crop through breeding and other agronomic measures since 1950 (Northwood and Tsakiris 1967). Cashew yields are reported to range from 048 kg/tree, with an average yield of 8001000 kg/ha.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major producers of cashew nuts are India, Tanzania, Mozambique and Kenya. However, its production is constrained by low and variable nut yields, nut quality and susceptibility to pests and fungal diseases, particularly Helopeltis and powdery mildew, even though efforts have been made to improve this crop through breeding and other agronomic measures since 1950 (Northwood and Tsakiris 1967). Cashew yields are reported to range from 048 kg/tree, with an average yield of 8001000 kg/ha.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, there is a need to evolve canopy management practices such as pruning and application of growth retardants to curtail the canopy. There have already been a few reports on spacing and yield in this crop (Dagg & Tapley, 1967;Northwood & Tsakiris, 1967;Lefebvre, 1973). These trials clearly showed that high density planting (below 9 x 9 m spacing) was advantageous only in the initial years but resulted in a decline in yield after 2-3 years of production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimum spacing varies with the age of the tree and its vigour, and with the availability of soil water. Since yields (per tree and per unit area) decline once overlapping of the adjacent canopies occurs (Northwood and Tsakiris, 1967), recommendations for the optimum spacing of these wide spreading trees vary as they age. There has to be a compromise between high initial yields at a close spacing (e.g.…”
Section: Crop Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%