IJM 2015
DOI: 10.34196/ijm.00128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cash Transfer Policies, Taxation and the Fall in Inequality in Brazil An Integrated Microsimulation-CGE Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He finds that cash transfers have a significant impact on poverty and income distribution and that these transfers lead to a greater reduction in poverty in rural areas than in urban ones. Cury (2016) also uses a CGE model combined with a microsimulation model to assess the effectiveness of Brazil's two largest cash transfer programmes (Bolsa Fam ılia [PBF] and Benef ıcio de Prestação Continuada [BPC]) in achieving poverty reduction and reducing income inequality.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He finds that cash transfers have a significant impact on poverty and income distribution and that these transfers lead to a greater reduction in poverty in rural areas than in urban ones. Cury (2016) also uses a CGE model combined with a microsimulation model to assess the effectiveness of Brazil's two largest cash transfer programmes (Bolsa Fam ılia [PBF] and Benef ıcio de Prestação Continuada [BPC]) in achieving poverty reduction and reducing income inequality.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most hybrid models combine CGE with microsimulation (CGE-MS) to capture the impact of macro-economic shocks on micro-economic distribution (Bussolo and Cockburn, 2010). CGE-MS models use the output of a CGE model as the input to the microsimulation model to analyze the micro impacts on income distribution and poverty from different scenario and policy shocks, including tax reform (Dizon, 2021;Mohammed, 2018), cash transfer programs (Cury et al, 2016), trade policies (Boysen and Matthews, 2017;Shuaibu, 2017), agricultural policies (Boysen et al, 2016;Cororaton and Yu, 2019), energy subsidies (Cockburn et al, 2018), health policies (Chitiga-Mabugu et al, 2021;Kabajulizi et al, 2017), and ecological changes (Cororaton et al, 2018;Siriban-manalang et al, 2016). Some hybrid models integrate other model types.…”
Section: Hybrid Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most hybrid models are CGE with microsimulation analysis (CGE-MS) models, with the modeling framework combines macro-CGE models with microsimulation models to capture the impact of macro-shocks on micro-distributions (Bussolo and Cockburn, 2010). CGE-MS models use the output of the CGE model as the input of the microsimulation model to analyze the micro impacts on income distribution and poverty from different scenarios, including taxes reforms (DIZON, 2021;Mohammed, 2018), cash transfer programs (Cury et al, 2016), trade policies (Boysen and Matthews, 2017;Shuaibu, 2017), agricultural policies (Boysen et al, 2016;C. B. Cororaton and Yu, 2019), energy subsidies (Cockburn et al, 2018), health (Chitiga-Mabugu et al, 2021Kabajulizi et al, 2017), and ecological changes (C. Cororaton et al, 2018;Siriban-manalang et al, 2016).…”
Section: • Hybrid Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%