2011
DOI: 10.15232/s1080-7446(15)30524-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CASE STUDY: Environmental benefits of ractopamine use in United States finisher swine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lowering nutrient input through the use of feed additives such as amino acids has been shown to reduce emission of NH 3 (Colina et al, 2001), but its effect on VOC odorant emissions or reduced sulfur odor emissions has not been studied. Using various additives, such as enzymes or probiotics, in swine feed has been shown to affect emissions or excretion (Armstrong et al, 2000; Le et al, 2007; O'Shea et al, 2011; McAlpine et al, 2012; Ziemer et al, 2012) through increased feed efficiency and potentially reduced emissions (Woods et al, 2011; Ziemer et al, 2012), but their effect on odor emission is nonexistent. Oat‐based diets have a lower odor emission compared with barley‐based diets (O'Shea et al, 2010), and higher fiber levels have a tendency to lower manure pH, as does the addition of benzoic acid (Bühler et al, 2006; Murphy et al, 2011), which could potentially change odor profiles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lowering nutrient input through the use of feed additives such as amino acids has been shown to reduce emission of NH 3 (Colina et al, 2001), but its effect on VOC odorant emissions or reduced sulfur odor emissions has not been studied. Using various additives, such as enzymes or probiotics, in swine feed has been shown to affect emissions or excretion (Armstrong et al, 2000; Le et al, 2007; O'Shea et al, 2011; McAlpine et al, 2012; Ziemer et al, 2012) through increased feed efficiency and potentially reduced emissions (Woods et al, 2011; Ziemer et al, 2012), but their effect on odor emission is nonexistent. Oat‐based diets have a lower odor emission compared with barley‐based diets (O'Shea et al, 2010), and higher fiber levels have a tendency to lower manure pH, as does the addition of benzoic acid (Bühler et al, 2006; Murphy et al, 2011), which could potentially change odor profiles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quadratic trend was observed (p < 0.05) on phosphorus content in feces from those animals fed 10 mg of ractopamine kg -1 diet (Y=2.312-0.277X+0.065X²; R²=0.6563), with reduced excretion of this mineral on the second experimental week (2.12). Woods et al (2011) observed that 18 mg of ractopamine kg -1 diet has not modified the phosphorus excreted in feces, though a reduction on phosphorus excreted in urine was verified, concluding that this beta-adrenergic agonist can change the phosphorus retention in pigs at finishing phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although its use has obtained approval as a feed additive for swine in the USA, Canada, Mexico and Brazil, ractopamine is prohibited in the European Union, China and many other countries (Vezzoni de Almeida et al , 2012). Despite the potential contribution of ractopamine to environmental protection by increasing efficiency of husbandry, shortening finishing swine growth period, decreasing feed need and thus reducing the amount of water, fertilizer and pesticide for crop cultivation (Woods et al , 2011), people inevitably are still worried about the safety of ractopamine residue in meat especially in those countries where pork is imported from the USA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%