Case studies on CO2 transport infrastructure: Optimization of pipeline network, effect of ownership, and political incentives

Brunsvold, Amy L.; Jakobsen, Jana P.; Husebye, Jo; Калинин, А. В.

doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.213

Cited by 21 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The storage sites may be depleted oil and gas fields, saline acquifers, coal seams and other similar formations (Davison et al, 2001;Pires et al, 2011). commercialization of CCS (Brunsvold et al, 2011). Similar work has also been done in the United States (Ambrose, et al, 2009) and developing countries such as China and India (Condor et al, 2011).…”

Section: Introduce the Problemmentioning

confidence: 50%

Optimization of Network Carbon Capture and Storage System (CCS) Using Mathematical Approach

Licindo¹,

Paramudita²,

Handogo

et al. 2015

MAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is one of the technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) to capture of CO 2 from the flue gas of a power plant that typically use coal as a Source of energy and then store it in a suitable geological storage (in specific locations). In practice, these sites may not be readily available for storage at the same time that the Sources (GHG producing) are operating which gives rise to multi -period planning problems. This study presents a mathematical approach by considering constraints limit flowrate received by Sink, various time availability of Sink and Source and calculation with the purpose to determine the minimum cost network which is getting the maximum load that is exchanged from Source to Sink. Illustrative case studies are given to demonstrate the application of mathematical models to obtained with the exact result of the exchange network from Source to Sink. Derived from network obtained from the calculation of the Maximum Load Source to Sink and results may vary in accordance with the limitations that exist in the mathematical model. The case study has been prepared with 2 cases, first 6 Source and 3 Sink with value of Source Load is greater than the amount available on the Sink. Also, second case is 2 Source and 5 Sink with value of Source Load is smaller than the amount available on the Sink. In addition, Case Studies to minimize the cost of pipeline construction and distribution of CO 2 by plant and storage location determination in Java. Flowrate restriction factor that goes into Sink, Source and Sink establishment time and cost are taken into account can affect the networks that can be exchanged from the Source to the Sink.

show abstract

Section: Introduce the Problemmentioning

confidence: 50%

Optimization of Network Carbon Capture and Storage System (CCS) Using Mathematical Approach

Licindo¹,

Paramudita²,

Handogo

et al. 2015

MAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The equation presented in Kang et al [66] includes location factor, L f and temperature factor, T. Equation (13) gives pipe thickness values between those obtained with Equations (11) and (12):…”

Section: Pipeline Wall Thicknessmentioning

confidence: 99%

CO2 Pipeline Design: A Review

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a need to accurately design pipelines to meet the expected increase in the construction of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) pipelines after the signing of the Paris Climate Agreement. CO 2 pipelines are usually designed with the assumption of a pure CO 2 fluid, even though it usually contains impurities, which affect the critical pressure, critical temperature, phase behaviour, and pressure and temperature changes in the pipeline. The design of CO 2 pipelines and the calculation of process parameters and fluid properties is not quite accurate with the assumption of pure CO 2 fluids. This paper reviews the design of rich CO 2 pipelines including pipeline route selection, length and right of way, fluid flow rates and velocities, need for single point-to-point or trunk pipelines, pipeline operating pressures and temperatures, pipeline wall thickness, fluid stream composition, fluid phases, and pipeline diameter and pressure drop calculations. The performance of a hypothetical pipeline was simulated using gPROMS (ver. 4.2.0) and Aspen HYSYS (ver.10.1) and the results of both software were compared to validate equations. Pressure loss due to fluid acceleration was ignored in the development of the diameter/pressure drop equations. Work is ongoing to incorporate fluid acceleration effect and the effects of impurities to improve the current models.

show abstract

“…To obtain all the specific requirements for CO 2 pipeline design and sizing, an integrated approach needs to be adopted [68,82,119,140,142]. A reliable method for design of the CO 2 transport pipeline in detail considers the effect of both the environment (soil or water) temperature and CO 2 flow rate on pipeline diameter and length.…”

Section: Pipeline Sizing Design and Network Configurationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, the design procedure includes hydraulic analysis to estimate the optimum pressure drop for the CO 2 transport pipeline, considering both the obstructions in the pipeline path such as roads, bridges, rails and the insulation. It is claimed that to design an efficient CO 2 transport pipeline network, the distance between the CO 2 source and utilisation or storage site, network topology and CO 2 transportation mode must be considered [16,24,32,140,[143][144][145]. Several sources reported on the maximum distance before booster pump stations for repressurisation to both maintain the CO 2 stream in a supercritical phase and minimise the power requirement [62,86,143,[146][147][148][149].…”

Section: Pipeline Sizing Design and Network Configurationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is because when considering the substantial lengths of CO 2 pipelines, a miscalculation in the optimum diameter can result in incurring an additional capital cost that could have been avoided. In this regard, several sources indicated that consideration of technical factors, such as material roughness, flow rate, pressure drop per unit length, viscosity/density of the fluid and differences in topography, are necessary for determination of the appropriate diameter [84,[139][140][141].…”

Section: Pipeline Sizing Design and Network Configurationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A systematic review of key challenges of CO2 transport via pipelines

Onyebuchi

Kolios

Hanak

et al. 2018

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

138

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Transport of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) via pipeline from the point of capture to a geologically suitable location for either sequestration or enhanced hydrocarbon recovery is a vital aspect of the carbon capture and storage (CCS) chain. This means of CO 2 transport has a number of advantages over other means of CO 2 transport, such as truck, rail, and ship. Pipelines ensure continuous transport of CO 2 from the capture point to the storage site, which is essential to transport the amount of CO 2 captured from the source facilities, such as fossil fuel power plants, operating in a continuous manner. Furthermore, using pipelines is regarded as more economical than other means of CO 2 transportThe greatest challenges of CO 2 transport via pipelines are related to integrity, flow assurance, capital and operating costs, and health, safety and environmental factors. Deployment of CCS pipeline projects is based either on point-to-point transport, in which case a specific source matches a specific storage point, or through the development of pipeline networks with a backbone CO 2 pipeline. In the latter case, the CO 2 streams, which are characterised by a varying impurity level and handled by the individual operators, are linked to the backbone CO 2 pipeline for further compression and transport. This may pose some additional challenges.This review involves a systematic evaluation of various challenges that delay the deployment of CO 2 pipeline transport and is based on an extensive survey of the literature. It is aimed at confidence-building in the technology and improving economics in the long run. Moreover, the knowledge gaps were identified, including lack of analyses on a holistic assessment of component impurities, corrosion consideration at the conceptual stage, the effect of elevation on CO 2 dense phase characteristics, permissible water levels in liquefied CO 2 , and commercial risks associated with project abandonment or cancellation resulting from high project capital and operating costs.2

show abstract

Case studies on CO2 transport infrastructure: Optimization of pipeline network, effect of ownership, and political incentives

Cited by 21 publications

References 1 publication

Optimization of Network Carbon Capture and Storage System (CCS) Using Mathematical Approach

Optimization of Network Carbon Capture and Storage System (CCS) Using Mathematical Approach

CO2 Pipeline Design: A Review

A systematic review of key challenges of CO2 transport via pipelines

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About