1960
DOI: 10.1037/h0042302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case history correlates of three MMPI profile types.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These profile types were familiar on the basis of experience and previous research concerning profile types. 4 From this sorting, several sets of profiles emerged. Profiles in each set were very similar to one another in shape and interpretation.…”
Section: Methods Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These profile types were familiar on the basis of experience and previous research concerning profile types. 4 From this sorting, several sets of profiles emerged. Profiles in each set were very similar to one another in shape and interpretation.…”
Section: Methods Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many profiles are so common and so frequently associated with certain important character and personality syndromes that they can provide a reliable indicator of the syndrome or character type. 4 …”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…All veterans included in the study produced a valid MMPI that was administered not more that 21 days before or 21 days after admission. All the veterans were between 20 and 60 years of age, with an estimated IQ above 104 (Gilberstadt & Duker, 1960). In a subsequent report, Gilberstadt (1969) discussed in more detail the process that evolved in the selection of profile clusters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common code types based on a two-digit coding system and various correlates of the profiles began to emerge (Dahlstrom & Welsh, 1960;Welsh & Dahlstrom, 1956). Gilberstadt and Duker (1960) made the first systematic attempt to provide a "cookbook" for actuarial description of personality. Answering Meehl's (1956) appeal they selected three fairly similar code types, the 27, 274, 278 profiles, and found significant between-type differences with respect to historical and symptomatic variables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%