Abstract:Chronic otitis media with effusion (OME) has been associated with a shift in microbiome composition and microbial interaction in the upper respiratory tract (URT). While most studies have focused on potential pathogens, this study aimed to find bacteria that could be protective against OME through a case-control microbiome study and characterization of isolates from healthy subjects. The URT and ear microbiome profiles of 70 chronic OME patients and 53 controls were compared by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Ha… Show more
“…Most of the samples analyzed are from OME cases (85.71%). Therefore, the identification of H. influenzae as the most prevalent pathogen in the MEF agrees with other studies that report H. influenzae as the predominant pathogen in OME [8,14,35]. However, the reported prevalence rates are highly variable due to different health care programs, particularly vaccination, in various geographical locations [36].…”
Understanding the bacterial etiology of otitis media (OM) is important when designing and evaluating the best course of treatment. This study analyzed middle ear fluid (MEF) and nasopharynx (NP) samples collected from 49 children with OM undergoing myringotomy in the northwestern Portuguese district of Braga. A correlation between species in the NP and MEF was observed following pathogen detection by culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) methods. Bacterial identification using culturing methods showed that Moraxella catarrhalis was the most representative in NP and MEF, followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae. However, qPCR of MEF showed a higher prevalence (61%) of Haemophilus influenzae. S. pneumoniae was not the most frequently identified species, but it still remains one of the leading causes of OM in this region despite 93.9% of the children being vaccinated with the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Furthermore, 46% of the samples analyzed by qPCR identified more than two bacterial species. M. catarrhalis and S. pneumoniae were the most frequent combination identified in NP and MEF samples by culturing methods. Additionally, a few NP and MEF samples simultaneously presented the three main otopathogens. These results point out that polymicrobial infections play an important role in OM. Further studies characterizing the serotypes of the strains isolated, their resistance profile, and their biofilm forming ability would help in the development of more targeted strategies against otitis media.
“…Most of the samples analyzed are from OME cases (85.71%). Therefore, the identification of H. influenzae as the most prevalent pathogen in the MEF agrees with other studies that report H. influenzae as the predominant pathogen in OME [8,14,35]. However, the reported prevalence rates are highly variable due to different health care programs, particularly vaccination, in various geographical locations [36].…”
Understanding the bacterial etiology of otitis media (OM) is important when designing and evaluating the best course of treatment. This study analyzed middle ear fluid (MEF) and nasopharynx (NP) samples collected from 49 children with OM undergoing myringotomy in the northwestern Portuguese district of Braga. A correlation between species in the NP and MEF was observed following pathogen detection by culture and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) methods. Bacterial identification using culturing methods showed that Moraxella catarrhalis was the most representative in NP and MEF, followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae. However, qPCR of MEF showed a higher prevalence (61%) of Haemophilus influenzae. S. pneumoniae was not the most frequently identified species, but it still remains one of the leading causes of OM in this region despite 93.9% of the children being vaccinated with the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Furthermore, 46% of the samples analyzed by qPCR identified more than two bacterial species. M. catarrhalis and S. pneumoniae were the most frequent combination identified in NP and MEF samples by culturing methods. Additionally, a few NP and MEF samples simultaneously presented the three main otopathogens. These results point out that polymicrobial infections play an important role in OM. Further studies characterizing the serotypes of the strains isolated, their resistance profile, and their biofilm forming ability would help in the development of more targeted strategies against otitis media.
“…Furthermore, probiotic treatment with Streptococcus salivarius has been explored for children suffering from chronic otitis media. S. salivarius can inhibit growth of most pathogens known to cause otitis media infections, among others including S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis [37,38]. However, it has not yet been shown that D. pigrum supplementation, in isolation or combined with Corynebacterium, can also effectuate short-term or long-term clinical improvement.…”
Purpose of reviewThe respiratory microbiota has a role in respiratory tract infection (RTI) pathogenesis. On the mucosa, the respiratory microbiota interacts with potential pathogenic viruses, bacteria and the host immune system, including secretory IgA (sIgA). This review discusses the role of the respiratory microbiota and its interaction with the (mucosal) immune system in RTI susceptibility, as well as the potential to exploit the microbiota to promote health and prevent RTIs.
Recent findingsRecent studies confirm that specific microbiota profiles are associated with RTI susceptibility and during susceptibility and found accompanying RTIs, although clear associations have not yet been found for SARS-CoV-2 infection. sIgA plays a central role in RTI pathogenesis: it stands under control of the local microbiota, while at the same time influencing bacterial gene expression, metabolism and defense mechanisms. Respiratory microbiota interventions are still newly emerging but promising candidates for probiotics to prevent RTIs, such as Corynebacterium and Dolosigranulum species, have been identified.
“…Corynebacterium is also commonly identified in COM but is typically viewed as a commensal, even potentially otoprotective in acute OM ( Lappan et al., 2018 ; Jorissen et al., 2021 ). In contrast, Porphyromonas , Fusobacterium and Campylobacter ( Figure 1 , Figure 3 ) are less commonly isolated from patients with COM or cholesteatoma ( Brook, 1995 ; Yusuf et al., 2015 ).…”
Otitis media (OM), defined as infection or inflammation of the middle ear (ME), remains a major public health problem worldwide. Cholesteatoma is a non-cancerous, cyst-like lesion in the ME that may be acquired due to chronic OM and cause disabling complications. Surgery is required for treatment, with high rates of recurrence. Current antibiotic treatments have been largely targeted to previous culturable bacteria, which may lead to antibiotic resistance or treatment failures. For this study, our goal was to determine the microbiota of cholesteatoma tissue in comparison with other ME tissues in patients with long-standing chronic OM. ME samples including cholesteatoma, granulation tissue, ME mucosa and discharge were collected from patients undergoing tympanomastoidectomy surgery for chronic OM. Bacteria were profiled by 16S rRNA gene sequencing in 103 ME samples from 53 patients. Respiratory viruses were also screened in 115 specimens from 45 patients. Differences in bacterial profiles (beta-diversity) and the relative abundances of individual taxa were observed between cholesteatoma and ME sample-types. Additionally, patient age was associated with differences in overall microbiota composition while numerous individual taxa were differentially abundant across age quartiles. No viruses were identified in screened ME samples. Biodiversity was moderately lower in cholesteatoma and ME discharge compared to ME mucosal tissues. We also present overall bacterial profiles of ME tissues by sample-type, age, cholesteatoma diagnosis and quinolone use, including prevalent bacterial taxa. Our findings will be useful for fine-tuning treatment protocols for cholesteatoma and chronic OM in settings with limited health care resources.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.