2005
DOI: 10.1017/s0269888906000567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case-based recommender systems

Abstract: We describe recommender systems and especially case-based recommender systems. We define a framework in which these systems can be understood. The framework contrasts collaborative with case-based, reactive with proactive, single-shot with conversational, and asking with proposing. Within this framework, we review a selection of papers from the case-based recommender systems literature, covering the development of these systems over the last ten years.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
115
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
115
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The collaborative filtering approach recommends items that do not exist in the active user's profile but those that other users have rated highly. In contrast, the content-based approach makes recommendations based on the item's similarity to previous items liked by the target user, without directly relying on the preferences of other users [1], [2]. The collaborative filtering approach recognizes users whose preferences are similar to those of a particular user and recommends items they have liked whereas the content-based approach recommends items similar to those a particular user has liked in the past [9].…”
Section: Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The collaborative filtering approach recommends items that do not exist in the active user's profile but those that other users have rated highly. In contrast, the content-based approach makes recommendations based on the item's similarity to previous items liked by the target user, without directly relying on the preferences of other users [1], [2]. The collaborative filtering approach recognizes users whose preferences are similar to those of a particular user and recommends items they have liked whereas the content-based approach recommends items similar to those a particular user has liked in the past [9].…”
Section: Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, CBR retains the positive problem-solving experiences for further reuse. All of these processes make up the traditional 4R processes of CBR: retrieve, reuse, revise, and retain [2], [10], [11]. This knowledge may be reused when required without applying the entire procedure from scratch, or when highlighting a procedure that should be eliminated in a similar problem.…”
Section: Case-based Recommendersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally speaking, people do not state their preferences up-front because initially they only have a vague idea of the product they would like to have [5]. Usually, criteria about the product the customer would like to purchase are specified during the dialogue with the seller.…”
Section: Conversational Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversational recommender systems [5] recognise that their users may be willing and able to provide more information on their constraints and preferences, over a dialogue. The main difference with the single-shot recommendation scenario is that in the case where the user is not satisfied she can revise her request.…”
Section: Conversational Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%