2009
DOI: 10.1177/0309132508094074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cartography: maps 2.0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
111
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
111
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…As with other disciplinary influences, the footprint of geographic epistemologies in cartography only has grown with the possibility of interactive and online maps -a collection of information, maps, and technologies collectively described as the GeoWeb (Crampton, 2009;Haklay, Singleton, & Parker, 2008). Hybridized geographic/cartographic approaches have been vital in framing and theorizing the societal challenges related to emerging map practices and technologies (Leszczynski & Wilson, 2013;Ricker et al, 2014).…”
Section: Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with other disciplinary influences, the footprint of geographic epistemologies in cartography only has grown with the possibility of interactive and online maps -a collection of information, maps, and technologies collectively described as the GeoWeb (Crampton, 2009;Haklay, Singleton, & Parker, 2008). Hybridized geographic/cartographic approaches have been vital in framing and theorizing the societal challenges related to emerging map practices and technologies (Leszczynski & Wilson, 2013;Ricker et al, 2014).…”
Section: Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cartographers and activists alike suggest that the digital tools available in the 'web 2.0' era -including volunteered geographic information, map mashups, and user-generated content -can help individuals and communities address deficits in what they know about their vulnerabilities to social and ecological harms (Elwood, 2009;Crampton, 2009;Haklay, Singleton, & Parker, 2008). By offering an 'exploratory engagement with content,' mapping 'apps' emphasize and legitimize the role of the amateur, redefining expertise and potentially allowing previously marginalized people to gain access to decision-making processes (Elwood & Leszczynski, 2013, 10).…”
Section: Interactive Map Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these applications have made maps more accessible to the general public. What is more, with the introduction of Web 2.0 and neocartography, the 'general public' can also contribute to the contents of these maps or create so-called mashup-maps based on available API's (Turner 2006;Haklay et al 2008;Crampton 2009;Kraak 2011;Roth & Ross 2012;Dodge & Kitchin 2013;Peterson 2014). The best known example of user generated contents (or Volunteered Geographic Information, VGI) can be found in Open Street maps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%