Cartilage–Perichondrium: An Ideal Graft Material?

Abstract

Temporalis fascia has long been regarded as the ideal graft material for tympanic membrane repair. However it often does not seem to withstand negative middle ear pressure in the post operative period. Tragal cartilage with perichondrium would appear to be a better graft material with good hearing outcome. It can be obtained easily with cosmetically acceptable incision. In the present study, we have compared the graft properties of temporalis fascia verses tragal cartilage perichondrium with respect to healing, hearing and rate of post operative retraction or reperforation. 132 patients of chronic otitis media with pure conductive hearing loss were posted for tympanoplasty. Temporalis fascia graft was used in 71 patients and cartilage perichondrium (composite graft) was used in 61 patients. Post operative healing, hearing and rate of retraction or reperforation was compared for both the graft materials. All the patients were followed up for 2 years. Patients where temporalis fascia graft was used, 60 (84.5%) showed a good neotympanum, 7(9.85%) had reperforation and 5(7.04%) had retraction pockets. Patients where tragal cartilage perichondrium was used, 60(98.36%) showed a healed tympanic membrane and only 1(1.63%) had reperforation. None of the patients showed retraction pocket or cholestetoma. Postoperative hearing was accessed 6 months after surgery. Patients with temporalis fascia graft showed an air bone gap of less than 10 dB in 49 (82%) patients and more than 10 dB in 11 (18%) patients. Air bone gap closure with tragal cartilage perichondrium was less than 10 dB in 45 (78%) patients and more than 10 dB in 13 patients (22%). Tragal cartilage perichondrium (\0.5 mm) seems to be an ideal graft material for tympanic membrane in terms of postoperative healing and acoustic properties. It can easily withstand negative middle ear pressure which may have contributed to the development of otitis media and significantly affect healing outcomes in postoperative period. Tragal cartilage being composed of collagen type II is also physiologically similar to the nature of the tympanic membrane.

Comparative study between result of temporalis muscle fascia and tragal cartilage perichondrium as a graft material in type 1 tympanoplasty

“…11 However, cartilage graft is characterized by its resistance to resorption, retraction and negative pressure in middle ear. …”

Boomerang-Shaped Chondro-Perichondral Graft Versus Temporalis Muscle Fascia Graft: Which One is to be Trusted?

“…For example, in a study performed by Chhapola et al the rate of perforation in temporalis muscle fascia grafts at 6. months was 4.2 %, while at 2 year controls, it increased 2-fold up to 9.85 % [18]. In the same study, rates of perforation in the cartilage graft at 6 month and 1-year controls did not change.…”

Indian Perspectives on Graft Materials Used for Repair of Tympanic Membrane

“…Postoperative healing, rate of retraction and re-perforation was compared for both materials. The results in this study indicated that composite graft had an edge over TF in terms of graft take up rates and hearing gain [39]. Another article was published by Shetty S which aimed at finding the post operative hearing improvement in patients having COM with pure conductive hearing loss, using different type of tympanoplasties.…”