2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.80.235319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carrier relaxation dynamics in self-assembled semiconductor quantum dots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For nonresonant excitation the randomization of the optically excited groundstate electron spin component can start only after relaxation into the ground state, whereas for direct s-shell excitation the generation may start immediately after the pump pulse hits the sample at time zero. Time-resolved differential transmission measurements 26 monitoring the S s population after the arrival of the pump pulse confirm that for resonant excitation the S s population increases immediately, whereas for pumping the T p state the S s population increase is delayed by the T p → S s relaxation time, estimated at 20-30 ps. Therefore, for p-shell excitation time zero is, in effect, shifted by the relaxation time:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For nonresonant excitation the randomization of the optically excited groundstate electron spin component can start only after relaxation into the ground state, whereas for direct s-shell excitation the generation may start immediately after the pump pulse hits the sample at time zero. Time-resolved differential transmission measurements 26 monitoring the S s population after the arrival of the pump pulse confirm that for resonant excitation the S s population increases immediately, whereas for pumping the T p state the S s population increase is delayed by the T p → S s relaxation time, estimated at 20-30 ps. Therefore, for p-shell excitation time zero is, in effect, shifted by the relaxation time:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The PL spectrum shown in Fig. 1 was taken at an excitation power density of 4 W/cm 2 , but increasing the excitation density did not lead to a well separated p-and d-shell emission as observed for a similar QD sample, 26 which is attributed to the inhomogeneous broadening. Figure 2(a) shows the TRE curves for different pump photon energies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3(a) that the signal can be described by a double exponential decay P PE ∝ A exp (−2τ 12 /T 2 ) + B exp (−2τ 12 /T 2 ) including a short coherence time T 2 = 30 ps and an approximately ten times longer coherence time T 2 . The short dynamics is attributed to the fast energy relaxation of QD excitons excited in higher energy states, e.g., in p shell states [30], into the ground state. On the other hand, the longlived signal with T 2 decay time corresponds to the coherent response of excitons in the ground s shell [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One then deals with linear equations, which can be analytically solved. Defining a capture rate C ¼ cn 0 =2 and assuming C h ) C; C e , 19,20 one finds the following relations on the resident-hole-spin and trion-spin z components, relating their values after excitonic capture with those before the r þ pump pulse:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%