2015
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2015.1077272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carrier effects on tertiary nitrifying moving bed biofilm reactor: An examination of performance, biofilm and biologically produced solids

Abstract: Increasingly stricter ammonia and nitrogen release regulations with respect to wastewater effluents are creating a need for tertiary treatment systems. The moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) is being considered as an upgrade option for an increasing number of wastewater treatment facilities due to its small footprint and ease of operation. Despite the MBBRs creation as a system to remove nitrogen, recent research on MBBR systems showing that the system's performance is directly related to carrier surface area a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations were performed in other studies, where a larger and flat shaped media with small pore spaces were also affected by clogging. This is especially when used at high loading conditions due to high biofilm growth, and despite their high specific surface area [49]. These results are also in line with Show and Tay, [38], where a decrease in media voidage, induced clogging and dead spaces, resulting in lower hydrodynamic and treatment performance.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Similar observations were performed in other studies, where a larger and flat shaped media with small pore spaces were also affected by clogging. This is especially when used at high loading conditions due to high biofilm growth, and despite their high specific surface area [49]. These results are also in line with Show and Tay, [38], where a decrease in media voidage, induced clogging and dead spaces, resulting in lower hydrodynamic and treatment performance.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…They have been used successfully for municipal and industrial wastewater including pulp and paper industry wastewater, poultry processing wastewater and dairy wastewater . The MBBR is being considered as an upgrade option for an increasing number of wastewater treatment facilities due to its small footprint and feasible operation . This process relies on the use of moving carriers in which microorganisms form biofilms.…”
Section: Membrane Biofilm Reactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[49][50][51][52] The MBBR is being considered as an upgrade option for an increasing number of wastewater treatment facilities due to its small footprint and feasible operation. 35 This process relies on the use of moving carriers in which microorganisms form biofilms. Thus, the slow-growing microorganisms, including nitrifying bacteria, can be retained in the system without being washed out.…”
Section: Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (Mbbr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constituent concentrations of the influent synthetic wastewater used in this work was modified from (Forrest et al, 2016;Hoang et al, 2014;Young et al, 2017a) and contained the following: Test and characterize the kinetics of the two reactors in series.…”
Section: Sb-mbbr Reactor Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample filtered using first a 1.5 µm glass fibre 691 filters (Millipore Corporation, Darmstadt, Germany), then further filtered with 0.45µm Millipore G filter (Millipore Corporation, Darmstadt, Germany). In accordance with the method established in Forrest et al, 2016, the 2 ml of the filtrate was pipetted from the beaker to the HACH COD LR vial. The vial was then sealed and shaken several times to ensure proper mixing.…”
Section: Soluble Chemical Oxygen Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%