2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2021.108930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carleson perturbations of elliptic operators on domains with low dimensional boundaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, analogously to (9.61), we can finish the argument. We remark that the elliptic measure of L on ∂Ω F fits the hypothesis and, in particular, is doubling by [MP,DFM4].…”
Section: And Otherwise Replace It With An Ancestorsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Then, analogously to (9.61), we can finish the argument. We remark that the elliptic measure of L on ∂Ω F fits the hypothesis and, in particular, is doubling by [MP,DFM4].…”
Section: And Otherwise Replace It With An Ancestorsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Indeed, it is not clear to us that sawtooth domains of PDE friendly domains are themselves PDE friendly. Even if they were, the construction of, and verification of PDE friendly axioms on sawtooth domains of some rough domains are long and difficult tasks [HM14,MP]. Our method resembles loosely that of the recent paper [CHMT], where an analogue of Theorem 1.22 is used to extend the FKP (additive) perturbation theory to the case of 1-sided chord-arc domains, but they also use sawtooth domains.…”
Section: History Of the Carleson Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would like to note that the arguments of [18,38,7] are written explicitly only in the case of real symmetric coefficients, but we would expect that similar arguments could be carried over to the non-symmetric case as well. We also mention [8], where the nonsymmetric case is also considered by using a different method, as well as [37], where perturbation theory for certain degenerate elliptic operators is developed in the setting of domains with lower dimensional boundaries.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%