Caring science research in the ambulance services: an integrative systematic review

Abstract

Background The ambulance services are associated with emergency medicine, traumatology and disaster medicine, which is also reflected in previous research. Caring science research is limited and, since no systematic reviews have yet been produced, its focus is unclear. This makes it difficult for researchers to identify current knowledge gaps and clinicians to implement research findings. Aim This integrative systematic review aims to describe caring science research content and scope in the ambulance services. Data sources Databases included were MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, Web of Science, ProQDiss, LibrisDiss and The Cochrane Library. The electronic search strategy was carried out between March and April 2015. The review was conducted in line with the standards of the PRISMA statement, registration number: PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016034156. Review methods The review process involved problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis and reporting. Thematic data analysis was undertaken using a five‐stage method. Studies included were evaluated with methodological and/or theoretical rigour on a 3‐level scale, and data relevance was evaluated on a 2‐level scale. Results After the screening process, a total of 78 studies were included. The majority of these were conducted in Sweden (n = 42), fourteen in the United States and eleven in the United Kingdom. The number of study participants varied, from a case study with one participant to a survey with 2420 participants, and 28 (36%) of the studies were directly related to patients. The findings were identified under the themes: Caregiving in unpredictable situations; Independent and shared decision‐making; Public environment and patient safety; Life‐changing situations; and Ethics and values. Conclusion Caring science research with an explicit patient perspective is limited. Areas of particular interest for future research are the impact of unpredictable encounters on openness and sensitivity in the professional–patient relation, with special focus on value conflicts in emergency situations.

Competency requirements for the assessment of patients with mental illness in somatic emergency care: A modified Delphi study from the nurses’ perspective

“…This makes sense from a caring perspective, as the encounter between nurse and patient is always influenced by the nurse’s commitment and their willingness to be open and sensitive to the patient and their vulnerability. 53 The present findings align with previous evidence that the quality of the encounter depends on the nurse’s professional relationship with the patient, 54 and nurses must be prepared to take responsibility for this relationship. 55 As a patient may present with signs or symptoms of mental illness, emergency care nurses must be sensitive to the patient’s privacy during assessment.…”

Patients' experiences of the caring encounter with the psychiatric emergency response team in the emergency medical service—A qualitative interview study

“…… Can you describe’ (see Table ). The development of the interview guide was inspired by previous studies concerning patient participation in the emergency setting . Data collection continued until no new information was obtained during the interviews, and all patients who were asked to participate in the study were contacted by the researchers.…”

“… The caring encounter in the EMS has challenges since the environment is unpredictable, the encounter may not always be on equal terms, and in addition the encounter sometimes takes place in public environment. The EMS personnel therefore need to be open or prepared and to take responsibility for the caring encounter, and the encounter depends on the professional‐patient relation and communication . To retain his/her identity by means of communicative contact, the patient also needs to be confirmed in the encounter .…”

Specialist Ambulance Nurses’ Perceptions of Nursing: A Phenomenographic Study

“…Health care provided by ambulance professionals is often associated with emergency medicine, traumatology and disaster medicine [ 1 ], despite the fact that approximately 50% of assignments are labeled non-urgent [ 2 ]. The rationale behind this study is the need to explore the specialist ambulance nurses’ (SANs’) perceptions of nursing based on their experience within the Swedish Ambulance Service (AS) due to the reported lack of knowledge about nursing in ambulance care [ 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. Recent research in the AS context reveals little or no focus on nursing [ 6 , 7 ].…”