2017
DOI: 10.1080/01634372.2017.1391364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caregiving Load and Respite Service Use: A Comparison between Older Caregivers and Younger Caregivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Shi et al . ), which as hypothesized by Jacobs et al . (), could result in a prolonged length of stay for patients.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Shi et al . ), which as hypothesized by Jacobs et al . (), could result in a prolonged length of stay for patients.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…To our knowledge, no study to date has investigated the impact of objective carer burden alone on length of stay for mental health, using such measures as hours of care per week and standby time or time 'on call' and, in the Australian context, there has only been one investigation of the impact of any form of carer burden on length of stay (Draper & Luscombe 1998). Caring for long hours (over lengthy periods of time) tends to be related to caring for someone who is more unwell, coupled with a greater need for carer respite (Jagannathan et al 2014;Shi et al 2018), which as hypothesized by Jacobs et al (2015), could result in a prolonged length of stay for patients. This investigation is therefore pertinent because if objective carer burden is highly associated with longer hospitalizations, attempts to reduce care recipient hospital days may be feasible, for example by targeting more timely and suitable respite options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in addition to the age of the caregiver, it is possible that the nature of caregiver-patient relationships guide the mobilization of social support. Existing research suggests that spousal caregivers are less likely to utilize informal support from friends and family than adult children caregivers, which may account for some of the findings reported here (Pinquart & Sörensen, 2011;Robinson, Buckwalter, & Reed, 2005;Shi, Chan, Ferretti, & McCallion, 2018). Finally, as this study did not measure the types and acquisition of social support for the two caregiving groups, it is possible that important differences exist in the specific types of support available, making this an important area of inquiry for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, only a limited number of studies have investigated factors that influence care-givers' respite service utilisation. Researchers have identified factors that may influence the use of respite care by care-givers, including service accessibility (Brandão et al, 2016), confidence in the services (Phillipson et al, 2014), nature of the care-giving relationship (spousal care-givers are less likely to use respite care; Neville et al, 2015), care-giving duration (Shi et al, 2017) and care-givers' characteristics (e.g. older age, education level and employment status; Moholt et al, 2018).…”
Section: Role Of Family Care-givers In Decision To Use Respite Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these studies, together with those from Western societies (Neville et al, 2015;Brandão et al, 2016;Shi et al, 2017;Moholt et al, 2018), shed some light on predictors of informal care utilisation in the Chinese context, there is a lack of detailed information on the facilitators of respite care use in China. In particular, to understand how to address better care-givers' unmet needs for respite services, there is a need to define multifactorial predictors affecting the intentions of family care-givers.…”
Section: Role Of Family Care-givers In Decision To Use Respite Carementioning
confidence: 99%