2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2005.00267.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caregivers as Managers of Subjective Wellbeing: A Homeostatic Perspective

Abstract: Background This paper proposes that the adequacy of service delivery and caregiving to people who are disabled should be assessed using two criteria. One is the objective circumstance of living, which should be at a standard acceptable to the community at large. The other is a level of subjective wellbeing (SWB) within the normal range. Method This latter criterion is a novel conception based on an understanding that SWB is homeostatically managed to lie normally within a narrow range of values.Results People … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(68 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distribution found in emotional well-being is also characterized by negative skewness. These results are similar to those found in other studies on quality of life (Cummins, 1995(Cummins, , 2003Felce, 2006;Hensel et al, 2002), about which the homeostatic theory of subjective quality of life (Cummins, 2003(Cummins, , 2005Cummins & Nistico, 2002) can offer an explanation. 4.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The distribution found in emotional well-being is also characterized by negative skewness. These results are similar to those found in other studies on quality of life (Cummins, 1995(Cummins, , 2003Felce, 2006;Hensel et al, 2002), about which the homeostatic theory of subjective quality of life (Cummins, 2003(Cummins, , 2005Cummins & Nistico, 2002) can offer an explanation. 4.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Instead, there has been a focus on service evaluations involving objective (e.g. [15]) or subjective [8,29] measures of residents' quality of life. The care relationship through which support is provided has been of importance only to the extent to which it impacts on the quality of life outcomes for residents.…”
Section: Th October 2005mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although interactions with a stressful environment that feels inaccessible may partially explain these difficulties, the relatively impoverished social relationships that people with disabilities experience also contribute to the problem. Furthermore, if an insecure attachment forms with the primary caregiver, then this relationship and subsequent insecure attachments may not serve as a social buffer against the persistent problems that often accompany the disability (Cummins, 2005;Janssen, Schuengel, & Stolk, 2002). Common problems include challenging behavior, low levels of activity and exploratory behavior, social isolation, mental health problems including depression, and strong physiological reactions in response to everyday stressors.…”
Section: Long-term Consequences Of Insecure Attachmentsmentioning
confidence: 97%