2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caregiver Strategy Use to Promote Children's Home Participation After Pediatric Critical Illness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motivation and focus over this 4-week baseline may also have been facilitated by the biweekly check-ins from the therapist asking parents to rate their child's current performance for each goal. During this phase, parents demonstrated the ability to independently come up with solution-based environmental strategies that were effective, as found in other studies [ 46 , 47 ]. Further studies should include a larger, more socially diverse group of parents in terms of family functioning, while monitoring the specific strategies used by parents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Motivation and focus over this 4-week baseline may also have been facilitated by the biweekly check-ins from the therapist asking parents to rate their child's current performance for each goal. During this phase, parents demonstrated the ability to independently come up with solution-based environmental strategies that were effective, as found in other studies [ 46 , 47 ]. Further studies should include a larger, more socially diverse group of parents in terms of family functioning, while monitoring the specific strategies used by parents.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Care plans that met all four criteria by both raters were classified as complete and participation‐focused care plans. Care plans that met these criteria and additionally included an environmentally focused strategy for goal attainment were classified as exceeding criteria, as prior literature highlights that environments have significant impact on children's participation but have been less commonly addressed in rehabilitation intervention (Albrecht & Khetani, ; Anaby et al, ; Jarvis, Gurga, Lim, et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential explanation for this finding is related to the impact the home environment may have on caregivers’ dissatisfaction with their child’s participation. Prior literature has consistently found that the home environment is associated with increased participation [ 5 , 21 ], and our prior work with these data found that the majority (89%) of caregiver strategies focus on tailoring the child’s environment to promote their child’s participation at home following PICU discharge [ 19 ]. Therefore, it is possible that while the child’s participation may not change in the first 6 months post-PICU, caregivers may have adapted the home environment to make it more supportive for the child to resume participation in activities [ 29 ], thereby influencing their dissatisfaction with their child’s participation over time [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When characterizing caregivers’ dissatisfaction with their child’s participation, it is crucial to delineate specific child factors (e.g., a child’s functional task performance), caregiver factors (e.g., caregiver stress), and environmental factors (e.g., physical and sensory layout of the home) that influence caregiver dissatisfaction with their child’s participation in valued activities within the real-life context of the home and family [ 5 , 14 , 18 , 19 ]. Data from measures of child, caregiver, and environmental factors were included as predictors for the second study objective.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%