Career development for female academics in Australian and South African universities

Abstract

South African and Australian higher education sector is facing challenges of fewer females in leadership positions despite policies in place in both countries. The main purpose of this integrative literature was to analyze and compare journal articles related to career development for female academics in South African and Australian higher education institutions to ascertain the challenges faced by women in both countries. South Africa and Australia were chosen for this study due to the differences in cultural background and legislation. Females are still underrepresented in leadership positions both in Australia and South Africa, hence this study investigated the reasons and provided recommendations to improve female academics representation in higher education institutions. A literature review of 15 research papers and journals articles published from 2010-to 2020 was conducted. The keywords “career development for female academics” were searched in three databases namely, Google Scholar, Ebsco-host and Emerald. The results from the literature showed that female career development in Australia is moving at a faster pace than in South Africa. The results also show that in both countries glass ceiling and limited female representation in leadership positions are rife in both countries. Female-only career development programs are essential to promote female development in higher education. As this study is focusing on two different countries on different continents, both countries have a lot to learn from each other in terms of policy implementations to enhance female career development. This article provides an analysis of the trends of female career development in South Africa and Australia. Therefore, from the existing literature for a period of 10 years, a conceptual career development model was developed.

Women Faculty Members’ Presentation and Activation in the International Academic Field: A Review of Sociological Scientific Literature

“…It appears that the male domination that prevails in the university field is linked to the under-representation of women faculty members in the administrative field of the university and to their non recruitment to high administrative positions. This reality is often accompanied by phenomena of devaluation, marginalising, biased comments, and professional sexism at the expense of women faculty members (Barrett & Barrett, 2011;Danell & Hjerm, 2013;Fotaki, 2013;Giuffrida, Steffey, Balsa, Morello, & Kapatkin, 2020;Harris, Ravenswood, & Myers, 2013;Hashim, Noman, & Kaur, 2016;Kanyumba & Lourens, 2022;Kele & Pietersen, 2015;McNae & Vali, 2015).…”

“…The literature review study by Kanyumba and Lourens (2022) was concerned with investigating the course of the professional career of women faculty members and their efforts to advance to high administrative positions in the university hierarchy in South Africa and Australia. This study revealed the great and arduous effort women academics must make in these two countries in order to claim administrative positions in the university field.…”