Career advancement of men and women in academic radiology: Is the playing field level?

Vydareny, Kay H.; Waldrop, Sandra M.; Jackson, Valerie P.; Manaster, B.J.; Nazarian, Gwen K.; Reich, Caroline A.; Ruzal-Shapiro, Carrie

doi:10.1016/s1076-6332(00)80321-9

Cited by 30 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…4 The explanation for the finding is not certain and may be due to differences in the academic tracks, authorship inclusion on publications, mentoring, 6 or interest. 15 Although all are potential explanations, further investigation is warranted.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predictors of future publication record and academic rank in a cohort of neurology residents

Dorsey

Raphael²,

Balcer³

et al. 2006

Neurology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We identified characteristics associated with future publication record and academic rank in a cohort of neurology residents from a single institution. Seventy-six percent of women and 94% of men currently hold academic positions (p = 0.10). Early publications may lay the foundation for future academic investigation as publishing before (p = 0.01) and during (p < 0.001) residency was associated with higher post-residency publication rates. Publication differences between women and men (1.5 vs 2.4 publications/year; p = 0.03) warrant further investigation.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predictors of future publication record and academic rank in a cohort of neurology residents

Dorsey

Raphael²,

Balcer³

et al. 2006

Neurology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Studies in other surgical subspecialties have shown similar results: male faculty publish more often than female faculty do, 42 but when adjusted for other factors (track, rank, and years in each rank), there is no difference in productivity. 3,4 Other research indicates that women have lower productivity as measured by h-index early in their careers, 28 though the publication productivity of women reaches and may exceed that of men later in their careers. 28,43 Our sample may suggest similar resultsassistant professor men outperformed women of the same rank, but both the sexes were nearly equal at the associate professor rank.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1 Despite the near equality of entering and graduating medical students, women have disproportionally entered nonsurgical fields upon graduation 2 ; are underrepresented in academic leadership positions, [2][3][4][5] including those within surgical specialties 2 ; and are first or senior author on publications less often, though that trend more or less mirrors the number of professors. 6 In 2012, women represented 14% of applicants to orthopedic residency 7 and 12% of all orthopedic surgeons.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gender Comparison of Scholarly Production in the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Using the Hirsch Index

Martinez¹,

Lopez²,

Beebe³

2015

Journal of Surgical Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For example, no differences were found in productivity in academic radiology (Vydareny et al 2000), or criminology (Stack 2002). In the social sciences, the area with the highest proportion of women, again there are no gender differences in publication (Stack 2004).…”

Section: Research Productivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Faculty Members’ Perceptions of How Academic Work is Evaluated: Similarities and Differences by Gender

et al. 2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A questionnaire about how academic performance is evaluated and the importance of teaching and research was completed by 265 faculty at a UK research university. Factor analysis followed by t-tests showed that male faculty had a more realistic understanding of how their research is evaluated, rate the importance of research to their careers more highly, and are more likely than women to work over hours through choice. Women faculty are more likely than men to work over hours because of teaching workload and rate the importance of a teaching qualification more highly, despite giving similar ratings as men to the importance of teaching to their career. The implications for differential rates of promotion are discussed.

show abstract

Career advancement of men and women in academic radiology: Is the playing field level?

Cited by 30 publications

References 8 publications

Predictors of future publication record and academic rank in a cohort of neurology residents

Predictors of future publication record and academic rank in a cohort of neurology residents

Gender Comparison of Scholarly Production in the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Using the Hirsch Index

Faculty Members’ Perceptions of How Academic Work is Evaluated: Similarities and Differences by Gender

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About