The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2018
DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm.2018.02.907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiorenal Outcomes in the CANVAS, DECLARE-TIMI 58, and EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trials: A Systematic Review

Abstract: tively (which did not require CVD). In conclusion, there is a need for large-scale studies of SGLT2i with matching inclusion/exclusion criteria and appropriate endpoints to ensure a truly direct comparison of the drugs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We described the differences in CV and renal outcomes between the three CVOTs (CANVAS, DECLARE-TIMI 58, EMPA–REG OUTCOME) in a previous review [35]. We argued that the different results of the trials were at least partially attributable to non-standard inclusion criteria, renal filtration function equations, and event definitions rather than inherent differences among the medications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We described the differences in CV and renal outcomes between the three CVOTs (CANVAS, DECLARE-TIMI 58, EMPA–REG OUTCOME) in a previous review [35]. We argued that the different results of the trials were at least partially attributable to non-standard inclusion criteria, renal filtration function equations, and event definitions rather than inherent differences among the medications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings suggest that empagliflozin may have only a modest effect over a three-year timescale on atherosclerotic mediated outcomes and that alternative mechanisms need to be explored, as others have suggested, that can more directly explain the cardioprotective benefits observed in the trial. [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] The first version of the UKPDS Outcomes Model (UKPDS-OM1) [23] was used previously to demonstrate that virtually all of the risk reduction observed in the prespecified secondary CV outcome of the PROactive trial (a composite endpoint of allcause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke) [24] could be explained by the observed within-trial pioglitazone-induced changes in conventional CV risk factors. [25] The predictive performance of the UKPDS Outcomes Model has also been validated previously in other populations with type 2 diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Гемодинамическая регуляция в нефроне при сахарном диабете и после приема ингибитора натрий-глюкозного котранспортера 2 (адаптировано [16] [23,24]). *** -p<0,001 NNT -число больных, нуждающихся в лечении изучаемым препаратом в течение обозначенного количества лет, чтобы предотвратить один указанный неблагоприятный исход (показатель тем лучше, чем меньше значение и короче срок); ОР -относительный риск или канаглифлозин, или дапаглифлозин, по сравнению с группой плацебо характеризовались значительно более низким риском возникновения нефропатии или ее ухудшения, что позволяет уверенно отнести ингибиторы SGLT2 к препаратам с нефропротективной активностью (табл.…”
Section: патофизиологическая роль почек и функционирование натрий-глюunclassified