1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1362-3265(99)80040-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac rehabilitation: The quest for quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…taking advantage of the group dynamic process, which is in line with Dusseldorp et al [10] as well as Wieslander and Fridlund [11]. A common task performed on a daily basis by the cardiac rehabilitation nurse is to provide education regarding lifestyle, the purpose of which is to give the women the insight and motivation to make the necessary lifestyle changes, as documented by studies, in order to prevent recurrence of the MI [23,26]. Studies have shown that patients’ level of knowledge increased after implementation of a structured health education programme but that it did not necessarily lead to the required changes in lifestyle [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…taking advantage of the group dynamic process, which is in line with Dusseldorp et al [10] as well as Wieslander and Fridlund [11]. A common task performed on a daily basis by the cardiac rehabilitation nurse is to provide education regarding lifestyle, the purpose of which is to give the women the insight and motivation to make the necessary lifestyle changes, as documented by studies, in order to prevent recurrence of the MI [23,26]. Studies have shown that patients’ level of knowledge increased after implementation of a structured health education programme but that it did not necessarily lead to the required changes in lifestyle [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Although clinical effectiveness has been described as ‘Doing the right thing to the right person at the right time’, this definition may be lacking two further elements: ‘Who is it being done by?’ and ‘Are they competent to do it?’ (Stokes, 1999). Evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation services has tended to focus on clinical and cost effectiveness, as measured by a variety of patient outcomes including mortality, risk factor reduction, quality of life and return to work.…”
Section: Effective Practice and Training Needs In Rehabilitationmentioning
confidence: 99%