2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac Rehabilitation and Survival in Older Coronary Patients

Abstract: Mortality rates were 21% to 34% lower in CR users than nonusers in this socioeconomically and clinically diverse, older population after extensive analyses to control for potential confounding. These results are of similar magnitude to those observed in published randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses in younger, more selected populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
350
2
20

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 443 publications
(388 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(19 reference statements)
16
350
2
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Observational studies with long‐term mortality were sparse and mainly focused on CR participation. Prior studies lack detailed clinical and treatment information, data on severity of medical conditions, and information about other quality of care/risk interventions that patients received, which serve as important factors for CR referral and participation 4, 22, 41, 44. Most prior studies were based on claims databases that do not contain information on CR referral.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Observational studies with long‐term mortality were sparse and mainly focused on CR participation. Prior studies lack detailed clinical and treatment information, data on severity of medical conditions, and information about other quality of care/risk interventions that patients received, which serve as important factors for CR referral and participation 4, 22, 41, 44. Most prior studies were based on claims databases that do not contain information on CR referral.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suaya et al used a landmark propensity score analysis as well as 2 instrumental variables derived from the Medicare beneficiary database to estimate the association between CR attendance and mortality. They provided key evidence for a strong inverse association between CR attendance and mortality 22. However, it was unclear how many non‐CR attendance patients did not actually receive CR referral.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De estos últimos pacientes, solamente 30% ingresa a RCV en Europa 8 , 15-25% en Estados Unidos de Norteamérica 10 y menos de 10% en América Latina 11 . Las posibles razones para esto incluyen el escepticismo médico sobre los beneficios de la RCV, la accesibilidad variable, la preferencia por indicar ejercicio en casa y el enfoque prioritario en los procedimientos de revascularización y medicación, por sobre las estrategias de cambios en los estilos de vida 12 . Algunos factores, dependientes del paciente son la falta de voluntad para comprometerse con el elevado número de sesiones de RCV y temas económicos, entre otros [13][14][15][16] .…”
Section: Rehabilitación Cardiovascular Y Ejercicio En Prevención Secuunclassified
“…[9] The application of CR to elderly patients has gained an increasing acceptance, and its benefits and safety have been documented. [10] In spite of this fact, CR is vastly underutilized in the elderly, and particularly in women. [3,11,12] A fear that physical training may not be safe, other than for patients at low risk, has led to many patients being excluded from CR programmes, even though the risk of a cardiovascular event is considered low after both high-intensity-and moderate-intensity exercise in a CR setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%