Cardiac Output Measurement Using the Transesophageal Doppler Method Is Less Accurate Than the Thermodilution Method When Changing Paco2

Abstract

Cardiac output (CO) determination using transesophageal Doppler is based on the measurement of descending aortic blood flow. Because cerebral blood flow is dependent on PaCO2, an increase in PaCO2 would result in an increase of CO because of the increase in cerebral blood flow and vice versa. We enrolled 30 patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery graft surgery in the study. The CO was determined by both transesophageal Doppler and thermodilution while PaCO2 was maintained at either 30 mmHg or 40 mmHg in random order. The CO by thermodilution was significantly higher at PaCO2 of 40 mmHg (4.17 +/- 0.94 L/min) than at 30 mmHg (3.78 +/- 0.85 L/min). On the other hand, there were no significant differences in CO by transesophageal Doppler: 3.85 +/- 0.76 L/min at PaCO2 of 40 mmHg and 3.77 +/- 0.74 at 30 mmHg. Bland-Altman analysis yielded bias and precision of -0.32 and 0.49 L/min at PaCO2 of 40 mmHg, and -0.01 and 0.34 L/min at 30 mmHg. These results indicate that both methods of CO measurement are in agreement at 30 mmHg of PaCO2, but the thermodilution method provides higher values at 40 mmHg of PaCO2.

The influence of laparoscopic vs. open gastric bypass on hemodynamic function in morbidly obese patients during general anesthesia.

“…Sawai et al . point out that arterial blood flow measured by HemoSonic 100 may change together with changes in PaCO 2 which occurs during capnoperitoneum [16]. HemoSonic 100 transesophageal Doppler measurement is a non-invasive, easy to perform method.…”