2014
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac Output Calculation and Three-Dimensional Echocardiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This provided hope that direct planimetry of the left ventricular outflow tract using 3D TEE could overcome this problem. A report from Montealegre-Gallegos et al 18 confirmed a bias of À10% of cardiac output estimation using 2D TEE using the outer edge left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral trace compared with direct planimetry with 3D TEE. Graeser et al 19 compared estimation of cardiac output using 3D planimetry of the left ventricular outflow tract with thermodilution and similar to the present study reported wide limits of agreement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This provided hope that direct planimetry of the left ventricular outflow tract using 3D TEE could overcome this problem. A report from Montealegre-Gallegos et al 18 confirmed a bias of À10% of cardiac output estimation using 2D TEE using the outer edge left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral trace compared with direct planimetry with 3D TEE. Graeser et al 19 compared estimation of cardiac output using 3D planimetry of the left ventricular outflow tract with thermodilution and similar to the present study reported wide limits of agreement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The authors demonstrated that the left ventricular outflow tract area is larger when measured using 3D methods owing to a frequent oval rather than circular shape and that the 2D measurement is likely to measure the short axis rather than the long axis of the oval, consistent with previous reports. 18,19 However, 2D aortic valve area planimetry was similar to 3D area measurement, although accurate planimetry required good visualization of the aortic valve leaflets, which may be compromised in stenotic or prosthetic valves. The aortic valve area is not uniform throughout systole, and the end-systolic measurement may be an overestimation compared with the time-averaged area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might be explained by better accuracy with 3DE and previous studies report increased accuracy and reproducibility of volume assessment by 3DE. 8,27 We used a Doppler-based technique to measure CI by 2DE; however, because the LVOT is oval in shape and can only be appreciated with a 3D method such as 3D echo or CT reconstruction, LVOT and aortic valve area measurements tend to be underestimated by 2DE compared with those measured by 3DE, 28,29 which may affect the accuracy of CI 2D .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, 3D imaging has demonstrated value in quantitative analyses of structural heart diseases 6,7,14,15 and hemodynamic calculations as well. 16,17 Recently, 3D echocardiographic data have been used for 3D printing of intracardiac structures. [18][19][20] Some studies have shown that 3D echocardiography is an effective tool for quantifying ejection fraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%