2008
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac damage after treatment of childhood cancer: A long-term follow-up

Abstract: Background: With improved childhood cancer cure rate, long term sequelae are becoming an important factor of quality of life. Signs of cardiovascular disease are frequently found in long term survivors of cancer. Cardiac damage may be related to irradiation and chemotherapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Tei index and DT also showed significant changes (p=<0.001). These findings were consistent with the medical literature 28 29. Diastolic dysfunction has been reported to predict future systolic dysfunction,30 and the same was observed in our study as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The Tei index and DT also showed significant changes (p=<0.001). These findings were consistent with the medical literature 28 29. Diastolic dysfunction has been reported to predict future systolic dysfunction,30 and the same was observed in our study as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Meanwhile, radiological, endocrinological, psychological or any additional evaluations needed in follow-up care, as well as screening for late eff ects of ALL treatment, are performed at our hospital. Screening, recognition and proper treatment of late eff ects are essential in providing the maximal quality of life [11][12][13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported up to 56% subclinical echocardiographic cardiac dysfunction and incidence of clinical cardiotoxicity (CHF) ranged from 0 -16% [7]. Study conducted by Velensek et al [18] showed isolated diastolic dysfunction in 28.6% of patients.…”
Section: Demographic Profile (N) No Dysfunction (N = 82) Dysfunction mentioning
confidence: 99%