2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cardiac anxiety after sudden cardiac arrest: Severity, predictors and clinical implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
26
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
26
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The current findings are in line with some, but not all studies, indicating that younger patients are more likely to experience anxiety symptoms. In addition, previous studies have shown that Type D personality is independently associated with PTSD at 3 and 18 months post‐ICD implantation and deterioration in psychological functioning at 12 months postimplantation .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The current findings are in line with some, but not all studies, indicating that younger patients are more likely to experience anxiety symptoms. In addition, previous studies have shown that Type D personality is independently associated with PTSD at 3 and 18 months post‐ICD implantation and deterioration in psychological functioning at 12 months postimplantation .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…They suggested that a clinically relevant cut-off score could lie between the intermediate and the high scores. Another study exploring cardiac anxiety after sudden cardiac arrest used the scores in the upper quartile (CAQ ≥ 1.81) for severe anxiety and the lowest quartile (CAQ ≤ 0.73) for mild cardiac anxiety [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] However, this mortal-ity benefit comes at a price: ICD shocks can cause significant negative psychological and quality of life effects even if the intervention is life-saving. 4,5 Therefore, the careful and appropriate selection of patients for a primary prevention ICD is critical, and yet, the criteria available for this selection-primarily guidelines from professional societies-are relatively broad. It is well-known that only some patients with a primary prevention ICD receive appropriate ICD shocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%