1996
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800830422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carcinoma in an ileoanal pouch after restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
30
1
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…31 Two pouch carcinomas have been reported after RPC. 32,33 One of these developed at the anastomotic site, but no mucosectomy had been previously performed and the likely origin of this tumor was the residual rectal mucosa. Ileal adenomas do not contraindicate RPC, but further follow-up will be necessary to assess the risk of carcinomatous transformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Two pouch carcinomas have been reported after RPC. 32,33 One of these developed at the anastomotic site, but no mucosectomy had been previously performed and the likely origin of this tumor was the residual rectal mucosa. Ileal adenomas do not contraindicate RPC, but further follow-up will be necessary to assess the risk of carcinomatous transformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of subsequent adenoma developing in the ileal pouch is 75% at 15 years of follow-up [5] . Three pouch cancer cases have been reported after IPAA to date [6][7][8] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No obstante, tiene una tasa global de complicaciones del 24%, entre las que se describen la obstrucción de intestino delgado, la sepsis pélvica, la disfunción sexual masculina y femenina, el fallo del reservorio y la reservoritis (21-29) y no es desdeñable el riesgo de desarrollar pólipos neoplásicos y cáncer en el reservorio o en islotes de mucosa rectal retenidos, de los que hay ya numerosos casos descritos (9,(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified