2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-014-0798-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carcass permanency time and its implications to the roadkill data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
37
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Grass snakes can be found in the reed belt of the lake Neusiedl in high numbers matched by the CORINE land cover class Inland marshes [37]. We monitored the study route on average every 11 days and might have underestimated the number of road-kills as the persistence time of carcasses could be lower [28, 51]. Notwithstanding this limitation, our current results are in line with previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Grass snakes can be found in the reed belt of the lake Neusiedl in high numbers matched by the CORINE land cover class Inland marshes [37]. We monitored the study route on average every 11 days and might have underestimated the number of road-kills as the persistence time of carcasses could be lower [28, 51]. Notwithstanding this limitation, our current results are in line with previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Since the surveys were dependent on the technical staff of the local road agency, carcass monitoring could not be performed for more days. However, 5-year data from 484 roadkill surveys in the same roads (5,164 road-killed animals recorded) showed that 60% of carcasses weight less than 100g [43] and, thus, are unlikely to persist on the road for more than three days [17, 19, 26, 44, 45]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All bat species are smaller in comparison to other commonly recorded mammal species, which implies an accelerated removal rate of their carcasses in the lane (Santos et al 2011). Small animals usually end up having a low permanence time on the road due to the action of scavengers (common in the region of the study area), natural decomposition, influence of rains and of the constant vehicular traffic (Slater 2002, Ratton et al 2014). In addition, the observer detectability during monitoring can be improved to some degree, but it is also inevitably limited by the carcasses size, which leads to underestimates bats and other small animals (Teixeira et al 2013b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%