1980
DOI: 10.2527/jas1980.505833x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carcass Characteristics, Time on Feed and Cooked Beef Palatability Attributes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
31
1
6

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
31
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…But for WBSF, Select samples had higher shear values than either Low Choice or Top Choice. Previous reports have also shown an increase in WBSF as marbling score decreases from Moderate to Slight (Tatum et al, 1980;Smith et al, 1985;Savell et al, 1987). These reports included beef that had an average WBSF of >3.1 kg, even in the Moderate marbling category, and thus typically reported differences in tenderness of > 0.5 kg between steaks with Moderate and Slight marbling, which is higher than the 0.38 kg observed in the current study on beef that was much more tender.…”
Section: Quality Gradecontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…But for WBSF, Select samples had higher shear values than either Low Choice or Top Choice. Previous reports have also shown an increase in WBSF as marbling score decreases from Moderate to Slight (Tatum et al, 1980;Smith et al, 1985;Savell et al, 1987). These reports included beef that had an average WBSF of >3.1 kg, even in the Moderate marbling category, and thus typically reported differences in tenderness of > 0.5 kg between steaks with Moderate and Slight marbling, which is higher than the 0.38 kg observed in the current study on beef that was much more tender.…”
Section: Quality Gradecontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Longer feeding with high concentrate diets resulted in higher beef flavor intensity (Bowling et al, 1978; Tatum et al, 1980), tenderness and overall acceptability (Epley et al, 1968). However, Epley et al (1968) noted that there was no further improvement in sensory quality traits after 139 d on feed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often associated with improved tenderness, juiciness, and flavour (Simone et al 1958;Gilpin et al 1965;Field et al 1966;Moody 1976;Crouse & Smith 1978;Harrison et al 1978;Tatum et al 1980;Dolezal et al 1982;Dikeman 1990;May et al 1992) although some workers have found this relationship to be weak or even non-existent (Breidenstein et al 1968 (tenderness only); Bowling et al 1977Bowling et al , 1978Reagan et al 1981;Parrett et al 1985;Miller et al 1987 (juiciness and flavour only); Jones et al 1991 (tenderness and flavour only)). These relationships may depend on how well marbling score predicts intramuscular fatness.…”
Section: Marblingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marbling tends to be positively associated with carcass fatness (Pearson 1966;Crouse & Smith 1978;Harrison et al 1978;Tatum et al 1980;Dolezal et al 1982;Huffman et al 1990) and with carcass weight and subcutaneous fat thickness (r = 0.80 and 0.79, respectively; May et al 1992). Nour et al (1983) fed cattle either silage or grain to different slaughter weight endpoints and found that increasing carcass weight rather than diet or breed significantly affected marbling.…”
Section: Marblingmentioning
confidence: 99%