1998
DOI: 10.1080/00288233.1998.9513346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of forage‐ and grain‐based feeding systems on beef quality: A review

Abstract: The literature pertaining to the effect of forage-and grain-based feeding systems on beef quality has been reviewed in light of considerable interest in New Zealand regarding the relative merits of grain-and grass-based beef finishing systems. In particular, fifteen experiments which compared forage-and grain-finished beef at the same carcass weight or degree of fatness, have been selected from the literature. When compared at similar carcass weights or the same degree of fatness, the type of feeding system ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
114
5
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
8
114
5
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from the literature on the effect of diet on instrumental variables evaluating meat tenderness are inconsistent, since differences can be confounded by factors such as BW, carcass fatness, slaughtering conditions, etc. (Muir et al, 1998). The nutritional strategies to improve meat tenderness are based on manipulating growth rate, since faster growth, with high rates of protein turnover, results in a lower proportion of maturated protein and stable muscle links, and, therefore, in tenderness benefits (Maltin et al, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from the literature on the effect of diet on instrumental variables evaluating meat tenderness are inconsistent, since differences can be confounded by factors such as BW, carcass fatness, slaughtering conditions, etc. (Muir et al, 1998). The nutritional strategies to improve meat tenderness are based on manipulating growth rate, since faster growth, with high rates of protein turnover, results in a lower proportion of maturated protein and stable muscle links, and, therefore, in tenderness benefits (Maltin et al, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of pasture diets on the characteristics of beef are well known (Muir et al, 1998;Schreurs et al, 2008); the attractiveness of differences in such characteristics appears to be strongly influenced by regional culture. In addition, forage diets can impart small effects, some beneficial, on meat and milk quality, particularly in relation to the fatty acid profile and antioxidant content quality (Doyle et al, 2001;Dunne et al, 2009;Doreau et al, 2011).…”
Section: The Multifunctional Roles Of Grasslandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the effects of forage-and grain-based feeding systems on beef have been investigated for more than 40 years, (Muir et al, 1998a;Moloney et al, 2008) usually these production systems (INT v. EXT or concentrate v. forage) have been evaluated during the finishing period. Very few studies have assessed the effects of production systems before the finishing period, even though production systems are varied and complex, including mainly the influence of the origin of the animals, age at weaning, diet and management before the fattening period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%