1974
DOI: 10.1179/030716974803288220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carburization of austenitic and ferritic alloys in carbon-saturated sodium at 916 K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The M 7 C 3 (MϭCr, Fe) carbides can only be found in austenitic stainless steels for very high carbon:chromium ratios, 17,51) for example, during carburizing. During surface carburization of type AISI 316 stainless steel, 52) the near surface region of the steel comprised predominantly M 7 C 3 where the local carbon content was about 4 wt%. The ratio to M 23 C 6 to M 7 C 3 phases increased as the carbon content decreased from the surface to the center.…”
Section: Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The M 7 C 3 (MϭCr, Fe) carbides can only be found in austenitic stainless steels for very high carbon:chromium ratios, 17,51) for example, during carburizing. During surface carburization of type AISI 316 stainless steel, 52) the near surface region of the steel comprised predominantly M 7 C 3 where the local carbon content was about 4 wt%. The ratio to M 23 C 6 to M 7 C 3 phases increased as the carbon content decreased from the surface to the center.…”
Section: Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature and kinetics of caburization of steels in liquid sodium at 450-650°C, where the activity of carbon in sodium is close to unity, were studied in the past. These studies led to the development of simplified carburization models predicting the evolution of the carburization kinetics of stainless steels in sodium [2][3][4][5][6][7]. In these approaches, apparent diffusion coefficients of carbon D app were calculated by fitting the carbon concentration profiles with the usual solution of the Fick's second law [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these approaches, apparent diffusion coefficients of carbon D app were calculated by fitting the carbon concentration profiles with the usual solution of the Fick's second law [8]. In most of the studies, this parameter was neither clearly related to the diffusion of carbon in the matrix (ferrite or austenite) nor related to an effective grain boundary coefficient [2][3][4][5][6]. Only Dickson et al [7] proposed a prediction of the carbon concentration profiles using two different apparent diffusion coefficients, D app , one for the apparent diffusion of carbon in the grains and another one for the apparent grain boundary diffusion of carbon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%