1977
DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(77)90268-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carboxyhaemoglobin. spectrophotometric determination tested and calibrated using a new reference method for measuring carbon monoxide in blood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The constants of Eq. 6 have been determined by calibration against a titrimetric method for HbCO in blood (16).…”
Section: Conventional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constants of Eq. 6 have been determined by calibration against a titrimetric method for HbCO in blood (16).…”
Section: Conventional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two samples of 400 ml of blood in a 2-liter round-bottom flask was purged either with CO (Tatragas Messer-Slovakia, purity 99.9 %) with the flow rate 5 l/min during simultaneous shaking (100 min -1 ) for 15 min = 100 % COHb or with medicinal oxygen (Tatragas Messer-Slovakia, purity 99.9 %) under the same conditions = 0 % COHb. The COHb content in blood was determined according to Dijkhuizen et al (1977) by UV-VIS Diode array spectrophotometer Multispec-1501 (Shimadzu, Japan). To 2000 μl of distilled water (Millipore-Simplicity, France) was added 2 μl of blood and vigorously mixed in the 1 cm quartz cell.…”
Section: In Vitro Experiments Removal Of Co From Cohb In Human Blood Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical discussion of these methods has been performed in order to propose the best method for the determination of COHb in postmortem blood that could be utilized in forensic toxicology laboratories where such analyses are limited in number (less than 20 per year). Validation of the discussed methods has been based on previously reported comparative studies (Dijkhuizen et al 1977; Baretta et al 1978; Dennis and Valeri 1980; Katsumata et al 1982; Zwart et al 1984; Vreman, Kwong, and Stevenson 1984; Goldbaum, Chace, and Lappa 1986; Costantino, Park, and Caplan 1986; Vreman, Stevenson, and Zwart 1987; Fechner and Gee 1989; Mahoney et al 1993; Van Dam, Pharm, and Daenes 1994; Levine et al 1996; Canfield et al 1999; Oritani et al 2000). Criteria for the evaluation have been considered simplicity, accuracy and precision of results, as well as time and cost of analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%