Two ligands bearing the 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxamide unit, namely PyPSMeH2 and PyPOMeH2, have been used to prepare complexes of FeIII which have been structurally characterised. The potentially pentadentate thioether ligand PyPSMeH2 affords only the bis complex (Et4N)[Fe(PyPSMe)2] (1), irrespective of the metal to ligand ratio, due to the weak affinity of the thioether groups for the FeIII center. In [Fe(PyPSMe)2]−, the two PyPSMe2− ligands bind to the iron center in a mer fashion and steric crowding among the pendant thioether groups forces one of the four deprotonated carboxamido moieties to bind to the FeIII center through the carbonyl oxygen, giving rise to an FeN5O chromophore. The tridentate ligand PyPOMeH2, in its deprotonated form, also gives rise to a bis complex, (Et4N)[Fe(PyPOMe)2] (2), in which the two PyPOMe2− ligands bind to the iron center in a mer fashion. In this case, however, less steric crowding among the smaller pendant ether groups allows binding of all four carboxamido nitrogens to the FeIII center in [Fe(PyPOMe)2]− giving rise to an FeN6 chromophore. This one N‐to‐O switch in donor atom makes the two complexes 1 and 2 very different. While complex 2 is low spin (g = 2.18, 1.94) much like the other reported FeIII bis complexes with two ligated 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxamido units, complex 1 is high spin (g = 4.3). The spin flip due to a switch in only one N or O donor atom in these two complexes is unprecedented. The two complexes also exhibit different stability towards water. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2003)